We performed a comparison between Genpact Cora SeQuence and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"Responsive Portal + Process Federation Server. This set of solutions offers a unified worklist to our customers."
"This product does the job in terms of executing the workflow."
"Provides the power to understand and automate processes."
"It helps maintain, and in many instances, lower costs, as well as to maintain those costs, keeping them stable."
"The reach with Integration Adapters and support for adding custom Java code are valuable features."
"The solution has helped us automate business processes."
"We use the solution to develop and deliver products."
"This solution has always been lacking in the user interface (UI), it needed to be improved a lot. However, from the acquisition of Spark UI, the UI is much better. Overall the solution is robust and has the ability to integrate with any product for complex workflows."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
"I would like IBM to consider including AI-enabled process mining, robotic process automation, and very good OCR capabilities from the computer vision side."
"We had hoped that the product would provide us with plug-ins like Salesforce. Its development environment needs to improve. We expect to see elastic features like containerization. We don't just need an on-prem virtual machine."
"The analysis reports could be much better."
"We would appreciate more user-friendly definitions of processes with a more user-friendly interface for documenting processes."
"I would like to see the solution be able to interact with other customer software solutions."
"They don't have a mechanism to achieve processes, data sources, and data."
"Our developers are complaining that it's too complex to maintain."
"UI is an area with a shortcoming that needs improvement."
Earn 20 points
Genpact Cora SeQuence is ranked 38th in Business Process Management (BPM) while IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews. Genpact Cora SeQuence is rated 8.6, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Genpact Cora SeQuence writes "It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". Genpact Cora SeQuence is most compared with Appian, Hubble and Tungsten TotalAgility, whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow. See our Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. IBM BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.