Compare Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. iGrafx

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda BPM Logo
32,761 views|21,300 comparisons
iGrafx Logo
3,451 views|2,029 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. iGrafx and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible.""The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface.""It has an open BPM""It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products.""The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand.""The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part.""When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version.""The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."

More Camunda BPM Pros »

"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good.""It is very stable. There is no downtime."

More Genpact Cora SeQuence Pros »

"Finding the right symbol and creating links, horizontal and vertical are the features I use.""Another good feature is that the numbering of the shapes in iGrafx is much easier and more convenient, in comparison to what is found in Visio. So far I haven't found anything similar to what I have with iGrafx, in that regard.""This product fulfills ninety percent of our needs, and we're happy as users of it.""Web diagramming and RACI have helped expedite the process, capture, and ownership initiatives of our organization.""It has simplified compliance with regulations and company standards."

More iGrafx Pros »

Cons
"The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw.""The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages.""Lacking in forms visualization.""If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map.""Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance.""I would also like a very easy to use form builder.""I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.""I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution."

More Camunda BPM Cons »

"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly.""The setup and configuration is complex."

More Genpact Cora SeQuence Cons »

"In the next release, I would like to see more layers like three, four, and five. It might be possible but I haven't seen it yet.""Dragging and dropping shapes is not as user-friendly as in Visio. In Visio, it's very easy to work with shapes and in very few minutes you can plot a whole, multi swim-lane, cross-functional process.""It would be helpful to be able to do more analytics and generate reports on historical documents that have already been uploaded to the server.""I would love to see a template and shapes for customer journey mapping."

More iGrafx Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The open-source version of the product is free to use.""I use the open-source free version.""Camunda is much cheaper.""We are using the open-source version of this solution.""It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range."

More Camunda BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"My company is trying to replace iGrafx because the license is a little bit expensive."

More iGrafx Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
438,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are… more »
Top Answer: It's free, open-source. I use the open-source free version.
Top Answer: Just today I encountered a problem with the current version, and that is the functionality of the BPM standard, which is… more »
Top Answer: The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good.
Top Answer: The pricing of the solution is okay.
Top Answer: The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly.
Top Answer: Finding the right symbol and creating links, horizontal and vertical are the features I use.
Top Answer: We have a free membership or a free version. So that's the main reason for us starting to use it, just because we… more »
Top Answer: In the next release, I would like to see more layers like three, four, and five. It might be possible but I haven't seen… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 44% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Also Known As
Sequence BPM Suite, PNMsoft Sequence BPM Suite
Learn
camunda
Genpact
iGrafx
Overview

Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.

Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:

  • Straight Through Processing (STP)
  • Human Workflow Management
  • (Dynamic) Case Management
  • Business Rule Automation
Sequence is a BPMS (Business Process Management Software) solution. Its development environment provides an environment for designing forms, tasks, messages, system integration, and flow connections. Sequence processes are, by default, operated from within a Microsoft SharePoint site. Sequence supports integration with Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services to enable managers to analyze performance and determine trends relating to KPIs and SLAs. In addition to integrating with Microsoft Office, SharePoint, and Dynamics products, it can be integrated with external systems through protocols such as web services, WCF. It also enables connection to enterprise applications such as SAP and Oracle. The product's architecture enables IT personnel to make changes to processes without taking them offline.iGrafx business process management and analysis solutions empower organizations to achieve maximum performance. iGrafx captures and communicates the alignment of strategy, people, processes and technology, and unites the entire organization around delivering business value. iGrafx delivers strategic and operational decision support to enable our customers to become and remain world class competitors.
Offer
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about Genpact Cora SeQuence
Learn more about iGrafx
Sample Customers
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, AccruentSouth West Water, Atkins, Wolters Kluwer, Hazera Genetics, GeRAP, Aon Hewitt, Atos Origin, SwiftTradeMultinational Bank
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider22%
Financial Services Firm22%
Non Profit22%
Construction Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company7%
Government7%
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Financial Services Firm12%
Healthcare Company9%
Comms Service Provider9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business52%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise33%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise72%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise50%
Large Enterprise40%
Find out what your peers are saying about Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. iGrafx and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Genpact Cora SeQuence is ranked 22nd in Business Process Management with 2 reviews while iGrafx is ranked 17th in Business Process Management with 4 reviews. Genpact Cora SeQuence is rated 8.6, while iGrafx is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Genpact Cora SeQuence writes "Good reporting, a very good dashboard, and easy to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of iGrafx writes "Provides comprehensive way to connect workflow and cross-feed documents, but needs support for multi-page processes". Genpact Cora SeQuence is most compared with Bizagi, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and AgilePoint, whereas iGrafx is most compared with Visio, ARIS BPM, Bizagi, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Visual Paradigm. See our Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. iGrafx report.

See our list of best Business Process Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.