Compare Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. Signavio Process Manager

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
437,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible.The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface.It has an open BPMIt allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products.The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand.The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part.When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version.The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read.

More Camunda BPM Pros »

The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good.It is very stable. There is no downtime.

More Genpact Cora SeQuence Pros »

Process management/Process governance is what we think Signavio is very good at.All in all, Signavio usability is excellent. Anyone can learn to use the tool quickly. This increases acceptance as employees are not facing a high learning curve. With the offered usability it is easy to model processes also live in workshops.We could increase the transparency and speed for the new ERP introduction. The status and changes by the new system are now clear to everybody and it is a great tool to train the people.As a business transformation suite, Signavio offers a number of integrated helpful tools. The Process Modeler helps with the conceptual work, but is directly integrated with the components of the Workflow Accelerator (Automation) and the Process Intelligence (Mining). This makes Signavio an indispensable service package.This is one of the best solutions and it is easy to implement.The collaboration hub is good because it allows us to share the models that we've captured and to get comments back, and we don't all have to be in the same room, it can be remote and over time.The collaboration function in the project views is valuable because people can comment on the processes and we can respond.The most valuable feature is that you can customize it completely with all of the attributes that you need.

More Signavio Process Manager Pros »

Cons
The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw.The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages.Lacking in forms visualization.If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map.Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance.I would also like a very easy to use form builder.I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution.

More Camunda BPM Cons »

The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly.The setup and configuration is complex.

More Genpact Cora SeQuence Cons »

The reporting is too slow and there is a limit of 250 processes.Moreover, the functionality to show different process variations with "views" could be improved to allow more customization of these views. I believe this would increase the user experience and administrative efforts maintaining these process variations.There are some small graphical bugs, but they are addressed immediately by Signavio to their product development team.Signavio already offers a wonderful range of functions. If variant management and customer journeys are optimized, Signavio can definitely bask in the glory of BPM tools. We also see optimization potential in the management of licenses, e.g. no named users but rather floating licenses and integration into the company's active directory.The licensing model could be better.The performance metrics appearing in the collaboration hub needs to be improved.I would like to see the inclusion of some document management functionality so that we don't need to integrate with a second solution to accommodate this.We would like a better way to give users the correct permissions for processes, whether to view or design.

More Signavio Process Manager Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The open-source version of the product is free to use.I use the open-source free version.Camunda is much cheaper.We are using the open-source version of this solution.It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range.

More Camunda BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
SaaS has no setup cost, just licensing fees.I think we're spending about $150,000 a year on licensing costs.I think that the price of the licenses is between $2,000 USD and $3,000 USD per license per year, plus the hub usage. I cannot remember the exact cost, but it is affordable.My client purchased one editor license and the collaboration hub, which covers up to a hundred people.This solution provides really great value for the money.Lower than the competition with highly flexible licensing plans.

More Signavio Process Manager Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
437,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand.
Top Answer: It's free, open-source. I use the open-source free version.
Top Answer: Just today I encountered a problem with the current version, and that is the functionality of the BPM standard, which is not yet implemented in Camunda. An example would be a new marker for tasks… more »
Top Answer: The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good.
Top Answer: The pricing of the solution is okay.
Top Answer: The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly.
Top Answer: Hello, so far most of the points you have reported are addressed here: https://documentation.signavio.com/suite/en-us/Content/process-manager/userguide/reporting-intro.htm
Top Answer: This is one of the best solutions and it is easy to implement.
Top Answer: I think we're spending about $150,000 a year on licensing costs.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
Sequence BPM Suite, PNMsoft Sequence BPM SuiteSignavio Process Editor
Learn
camunda
Genpact
Signavio
Overview

Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.

Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:

  • Straight Through Processing (STP)
  • Human Workflow Management
  • (Dynamic) Case Management
  • Business Rule Automation
Sequence is a BPMS (Business Process Management Software) solution. Its development environment provides an environment for designing forms, tasks, messages, system integration, and flow connections. Sequence processes are, by default, operated from within a Microsoft SharePoint site. Sequence supports integration with Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services to enable managers to analyze performance and determine trends relating to KPIs and SLAs. In addition to integrating with Microsoft Office, SharePoint, and Dynamics products, it can be integrated with external systems through protocols such as web services, WCF. It also enables connection to enterprise applications such as SAP and Oracle. The product's architecture enables IT personnel to make changes to processes without taking them offline.The Signavio Process Manager is an intuitive BPM solution for professional process modeling. Whether you want to create current-state documentation or target concepts, the Signavio Process Manager is your best choice for process modeling. Thanks to innovative web technology, you can get started right away and include your colleagues in collaborative design.
Offer
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about Genpact Cora SeQuence
Learn more about Signavio Process Manager
Sample Customers
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, AccruentSouth West Water, Atkins, Wolters Kluwer, Hazera Genetics, GeRAP, Aon Hewitt, Atos Origin, SwiftTradeDHL, Transurban, Prudential Life Assurance, Zalando, T-Systems, Audi BKK, 1&1, Bugatti
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider22%
Financial Services Firm22%
Non Profit22%
Construction Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider13%
Media Company7%
Government7%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm15%
Energy/Utilities Company12%
Manufacturing Company12%
Media Company12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider10%
Financial Services Firm6%
Media Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business52%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise33%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise71%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise70%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise84%
Find out what your peers are saying about Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
437,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Genpact Cora SeQuence is ranked 22nd in Business Process Management with 2 reviews while Signavio Process Manager is ranked 1st in Business Process Management with 36 reviews. Genpact Cora SeQuence is rated 8.6, while Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Genpact Cora SeQuence writes "Good reporting, a very good dashboard, and easy to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Signavio Process Manager writes "Enables us to identify business analysts that are working on two different things and link up efforts". Genpact Cora SeQuence is most compared with Bizagi, Appian, IBM BPM, Pega BPM and AgilePoint, whereas Signavio Process Manager is most compared with ARIS BPM, Celonis, Visio, Bizagi and ARIS Cloud. See our Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. Signavio Process Manager report.

See our list of best Business Process Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.