• Home
  • GFI LanGuard vs. GoSecure Endpoint Security Lifecycle

GFI LanGuard vs GoSecure Endpoint Security Lifecycle comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GFI Logo

GFI LanGuard

Read 10 GFI LanGuard reviews
1,934 views|956 comparisons
81% willing to recommend
GoSecure Logo

GoSecure Endpoint Security Lifecycle

34 views|14 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Patch Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GFI LanGuard and GoSecure Endpoint Security Lifecycle based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLTech, Kaseya and others in Patch Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Patch Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Alex Kimondo
A scalable, competitively priced solution with a good ROI and easy setup process
Use GoSecure Endpoint Security Lifecycle?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "GFI LanGuard has very fair pricing compared to other similar solutions out there."
  • "We are a gold partner and we receive favorable discounts. The price of GFI LanGuard is competitive. When you evaluate other solutions, such as ManageEngine."
  • "GFI LanGuard cost approximately $1,000 annually to use the solution."
  • "On a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being competitive, I would rate the price as a four."
  • "GFI LanGuard isn't expensive."
  • "I rate the pricing of GFI LanGuard a four out of five."

    • More GFI LanGuard Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about GFI LanGuard?
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of GFI LanGuard is its email spam feature.
    Read all 10 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GFI LanGuard?
    Top Answer:I do not have details on the licensing costs.
    Read all 7 answers   →
    What needs improvement with GFI LanGuard?
    Top Answer:The only drawback with GFI LanGuard is that you cannot directly integrate it from the Outlook email; instead, you have to first log in to the site to make changes. Instead of directly white listing or… more »
    Read all 10 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    9th
    out of 50 in Patch Management
    Views
    1,934
    Comparisons
    956
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    389
    Rating
    8.0
    29th
    out of 50 in Patch Management
    Views
    34
    Comparisons
    14
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    LanGuard
    GoSecure ESL
    Learn More
    GFI
    GoSecure
    Overview

    GFI LanGuard enables complete patch management of security and non-security patches to Microsoft operating systems, Mac OS X, major Linux distributions and third-party applications. It can also automate patching for all major web browsers too.

    Cybersecurity hygiene requires constant vigilance, including keeping all systems up to date with the latest patches. Even a single missed patch could expose your organization to a breach. When you manage enough workstations and servers, keeping software current can quickly become complex without patch management software to take care of it. GoSecure Endpoint Security Lifecycle (ESL) streamlines patch management by giving you granular control over your patch management policies.

    Eliminate Endpoint Security Vulnerabilities
    Poor patching, non-standard application deployment and unmanaged endpoint security put organizations at risk. GoSecure ESL protects, secures and manages your endpoints eliminating vulnerabilities that can cripple your operations. It helps you to achieve continuous control, protection and compliance. And with support for over 7000 applications, your can be assured that your most critical applications will remain patched against the latest vulnerabilities.

    Sample Customers
    BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company7%
    Construction Company6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business75%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise56%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Patch Management
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLTech, Kaseya and others in Patch Management. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GFI LanGuard is ranked 9th in Patch Management with 10 reviews while GoSecure Endpoint Security Lifecycle is ranked 29th in Patch Management. GFI LanGuard is rated 8.0, while GoSecure Endpoint Security Lifecycle is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of GFI LanGuard writes "A scalable, competitively priced solution with a good ROI and easy setup process ". On the other hand, GFI LanGuard is most compared with ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, Microsoft Configuration Manager, Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager and BigFix, whereas GoSecure Endpoint Security Lifecycle is most compared with .

    See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

    We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.