GFI LanGuard vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GFI Logo
1,934 views|956 comparisons
81% willing to recommend
Ivanti Logo
2,988 views|1,877 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GFI LanGuard and Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Patch Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
DddGgggg
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is easy to use and integrates well with other operating systems.""The most valuable features in GFI LanGuard are patch management and vulnerability assessment.""It is helpful to patch and scan vulnerabilities.""I like that the solution can block users from unnecessarily putting devices on the network.""The most valuable feature of GFI LanGuard is its email spam feature.""The most valuable features of GFI LanGuard are the vulnerability assessment, it provides us with substantial insight into what applications are running on the endpoint systems and what vulnerabilities are there in the running applications. The second would be the assets tracking. I'm able to see in the network whether my endpoint server is operating and if all the other IT equipment is running in the environment. Additionally, GFI LanGuard is not heavy on system resources. It gives a competitive advantage over others.""The initial setup was easy.""The most useful features of GFI LanGuard are vulnerability assessment and patching solutions."

More GFI LanGuard Pros →

"I have found the interface and ease of use valuable features. Additionally, it is very easy to patch VMs and other systems, such a Linux. We are able to do patches even without the internet manually.""Both in terms of features and operations, this is a good solution.""Ivanti Patch's most valuable features are the patch module and the package distribution.""It is very easy to use, as well as extremely efficient and accurate.""The solution is a good product and I have heard that the interface is more friendly than that of Windows.""I like the product's Peer to Peer patching feature.""We can set a maintenance window and push the patch.""We use the solution for security patching of Windows devices."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Pros →

Cons
"GFI LanGuard can improve by adding asset tracking.""GFI LanGuard can improve by adding more modules, such as asset control or asset inventory.""The version we are using only allows one person to use it at a time and does not allow multi-users.""GFI LanGuard has some technical limitations with machines.""GFI LanGuard could improve the rollback feature. If we have installed the wrong we have had some issues with the rollback function. Additionally, more input from GFI LanGuard for the custom software push install.""The only drawback with GFI LanGuard is that you cannot directly integrate it from the Outlook email; instead, you have to first log in to the site to make changes.""If GFI LanGuard had a cloud version it would be better for people that are working from home.""The documentation on how to use this solution in a Linux environment is not clear, which is something that should be improved because it is complicated."

More GFI LanGuard Cons →

"There are times when there is an update that causes some issues. These issues should be sorted out before the release.""The product's support and configuration need to improve. It needs to be more scalable.""The reports have to show the compliance level of the patching, which Ivanti does not provide.""Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune needs to improve stability. We had issues with patching.""It's a difficult configuration because you need to install many servers in a location, and you have to install the primary server in the main location.""Customers sometimes ask about non-existent features, and we pass these requests on to Ivanti.""Ivanti Patch could be improved with better integration with other cloud solutions.""I tried to be a partner of Ivanti and, from this vantage point, the quotes are, perhaps, a bit high."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "GFI LanGuard has very fair pricing compared to other similar solutions out there."
  • "We are a gold partner and we receive favorable discounts. The price of GFI LanGuard is competitive. When you evaluate other solutions, such as ManageEngine."
  • "GFI LanGuard cost approximately $1,000 annually to use the solution."
  • "On a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being competitive, I would rate the price as a four."
  • "GFI LanGuard isn't expensive."
  • "I rate the pricing of GFI LanGuard a four out of five."
  • More GFI LanGuard Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."
  • "The solution is affordable."
  • "While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."
  • "The solution is expensive compared to other products."
  • "The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."
  • More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of GFI LanGuard is its email spam feature.
    Top Answer:The only drawback with GFI LanGuard is that you cannot directly integrate it from the Outlook email; instead, you have to first log in to the site to make changes. Instead of directly white listing or… more »
    Top Answer:We use the solution for security patching of Windows devices.
    Top Answer:There are some issues in the on-premises infrastructure of the clients.
    Top Answer:I provide the customer with the steps to follow, and they follow their scheduling and procedures. I also provide the information to the people involved in the pilot. My role is solely to provide a… more »
    Ranking
    9th
    out of 50 in Patch Management
    Views
    1,934
    Comparisons
    956
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    389
    Rating
    8.0
    8th
    out of 50 in Patch Management
    Views
    2,988
    Comparisons
    1,877
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    323
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    LanGuard
    Ivanti Patch for Windows, Patch for Windows, Shavlik Patch for Windows
    Learn More
    Overview

    GFI LanGuard enables complete patch management of security and non-security patches to Microsoft operating systems, Mac OS X, major Linux distributions and third-party applications. It can also automate patching for all major web browsers too.

    Better protect against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications.

    Improve protection against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications by extending Intune with risk-based third-party patch publishing – without any additional infrastructure.

    Sample Customers
    BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross
    Presbyterian Church
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company7%
    Construction Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Government12%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business75%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise56%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GFI LanGuard is ranked 9th in Patch Management with 10 reviews while Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is ranked 8th in Patch Management with 10 reviews. GFI LanGuard is rated 8.0, while Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of GFI LanGuard writes "A scalable, competitively priced solution with a good ROI and easy setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune writes "Allows us to set maintenance windows and deliver patches". GFI LanGuard is most compared with ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, Microsoft Configuration Manager, Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager and BigFix, whereas Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, Quest KACE Systems Management, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and BigFix. See our GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune report.

    See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

    We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.