PRINCEWILL OPARAHead Banking Application Customization and Reporting at a financial services firm
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"We pay around $200,000 annually."
"The price of this product is higher than that of competitors."
"We used to pay about $100,000-$120,000 US or somewhere around there. That was a bit cost-prohibitive for us to continue."
"It is very expensive."
"The price of IBM WebSphere Application Server could be less expensive and there is an annual license required for this solution."
Earn 20 points
GigaSpaces XAP is ranked 13th in Application Server while IBM WebSphere Application Server is ranked 2nd in Application Server with 9 reviews. GigaSpaces XAP is rated 0.0, while IBM WebSphere Application Server is rated 7.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Application Server writes "Bad documentation, does not scale well, and has a lot of complexities". GigaSpaces XAP is most compared with Oracle Coherence and GridGain, whereas IBM WebSphere Application Server is most compared with JBoss, Tomcat, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Oracle WebLogic Server and IBM BPM.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.