GitHub vs IBM Rational ClearCase comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitHub Logo
4,295 views|1,818 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
924 views|658 comparisons
60% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GitHub and IBM Rational ClearCase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Git and others in Version Control.
To learn more, read our detailed Version Control Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Our code is secure.""The best feature is the ability to track the history of all code changes, and it's easy to use. Additionally, as it's open source, anyone can use that feature resulting in distributed development. This opens the door to collaboration with different code and developer, feature, and master branches of development.""The flexibility of this solution has been most valuable. It operates on a pay per use basis where you can ramp up or decrease usage.""The deployment is fast since we just have to run the script, and once it's done, it takes a few minutes.""A great feature is being able to have different repositories and different kinds of projects in a single solution at a single time. It's just a click away.""I have found GitHub stable.""The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.""This solution is just easy to use."

More GitHub Pros →

"ClearCase integrates well with other engineering tools and frameworks such as the Eclipse environment.""IBM Rational ClearCase is a stable solution. I have not had any difficulty with reliability."

More IBM Rational ClearCase Pros →

Cons
"GitHub should provide more integration in their next release, including integrating with Jenkins, CI/CD and Jira.""GitHub could improve by being more user-friendly.""There is a bit of a learning curve.""The security point should be addressed in the next release and scaling is also an issue.""The development team pushes the code into a repository, and the CI/CD pipeline will perform the build. We need open-source libraries to perform the builds. It would be helpful to have the ability to link to open-source libraries like npm libraries. I don't know if GitHub Actions provides this. I would like to see that in GitHub Actions if they don't.""Our firewall was blocking cloning and downloading with SSH.""I would like to see more security where a plugin was available for us to update in relation to security.""It would be useful to have tutorial videos within the GitHub dashboard."

More GitHub Cons →

"I have found it very difficult to understand many functionalities in IBM Rational ClearCase. We have had many problems and it is not user-friendly.""The protection needs to be improved."

More IBM Rational ClearCase Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The private repositories are free, which is very good."
  • "It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."
  • "The price of this solution is reasonable."
  • "If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."
  • "We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."
  • "I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."
  • "The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."
  • "The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."
  • More GitHub Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.
    Top Answer:You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version. It gives you all the possible features it has.
    Top Answer:The initial setup requires heavy documentation which can be challenging for new developers.
    Top Answer:IBM Rational ClearCase is a stable solution. I have not had any difficulty with reliability.
    Top Answer:I have found it very difficult to understand many functionalities in IBM Rational ClearCase. We have had many problems and it is not user-friendly.
    Top Answer:We are using IBM Rational ClearCase in Peru at two large banks for a code repository. However, it is not meant to be used as a repository.
    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 16 in Version Control
    Views
    4,295
    Comparisons
    1,818
    Reviews
    51
    Average Words per Review
    330
    Rating
    8.6
    8th
    out of 16 in Version Control
    Views
    924
    Comparisons
    658
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    255
    Rating
    5.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Rational ClearCase
    Learn More
    Overview
    GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

    IBM Rational ClearCase is an enterprise-grade configuration management system that provides controlled access to software assets, including requirements, design documents, models, test plans and test results. It be can be integrated with other IBM solutions, including IBM Rational Team Concert, IBM Rational ClearQuest, IBM Rational Asset Manager and IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere Software.

    Sample Customers
    Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent
    Atos SE, FEI, STM
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company23%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise77%
    Buyer's Guide
    Version Control
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Git and others in Version Control. Updated: April 2024.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitHub is ranked 3rd in Version Control with 64 reviews while IBM Rational ClearCase is ranked 8th in Version Control with 5 reviews. GitHub is rated 8.6, while IBM Rational ClearCase is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational ClearCase writes "Difficult to use, not efficient, but stable". GitHub is most compared with Snyk, AWS CodeCommit, Atlassian SourceTree, Bitbucket and GitLab, whereas IBM Rational ClearCase is most compared with Git, Bitbucket, IBM Rational ClearQuest, Helix Core and Apache Subversion.

    See our list of best Version Control vendors.

    We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.