Compare GitLab vs. Ixia BreakingPoint VE

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
69,050 views|36,935 comparisons
GitLab Logo
5,575 views|4,884 comparisons
Ixia BreakingPoint VE Logo
443 views|249 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Ixia BreakingPoint VE? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, PortSwigger and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: October 2020.
442,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Veracode has been fair. We use their SaaS solution and it's just an annual subscription.""No issues, the pricing seems reasonable.""They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.""They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.""For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."

More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
442,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Veracode has offered a dynamic analysis testing solution for several years, having launched our first offering in 2015… more »
Top Answer: I would recommend them. They have the ability to cover multiple languages and come with all the features you would… more »
Top Answer: SonarQube depends on completely what you configure the Rules. You will have the option of the Profile creation and can… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Compared 50% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Learn
Veracode
GitLab
Ixia
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

GitLab is a single application with features for the whole software development and operations (DevOps) lifecycle.

Ixia’s BreakingPoint virtual edition (VE) provides scalable real-world application and threat simulation in a deployment model that fits IT budgets by leveraging virtualization and industry-standard hardware platforms.

  • Seamless transition between hardware and virtual platforms enables easy translation of functional and performace testing in physical or virtual environments
  • Common licensing server shared among BreakingPoint VE, IxLoad VE, and IxNetwork VE
  • BreakingPoint supports all major Hypervisors allowing deployment in a wide variety of VM enviroments
  • Subscription based licensing model comes an all-inclusive license that reduces startup cost
  • Bi-monthly Application and Threat Intelligence (ATI) subscription updates ensure you are current with the latest applications and threats
Offer
Learn more about Veracode
Learn more about GitLab
Learn more about Ixia BreakingPoint VE
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, ReknerSiemens, University of Washington, Equinix, Paessler AG, CNCF, Ticketmaster, CERN, VaadinCorsa Technology
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm34%
Insurance Company13%
Retailer6%
Pharma/Biotech Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company6%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise56%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise69%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, PortSwigger and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: October 2020.
442,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
GitLab is ranked 14th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 5 reviews while Ixia BreakingPoint VE is ranked 26th in Application Security Testing (AST). GitLab is rated 8.6, while Ixia BreakingPoint VE is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Provides or mandates quantitative code into the Master". On the other hand, GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Tekton, TeamCity, Bamboo and CircleCI, whereas Ixia BreakingPoint VE is most compared with Spirent CyberFlood.

See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.