Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitLab Logo
2,967 views|2,446 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
OverOps Logo
32 views|22 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GitLab and OverOps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Synopsys, Snyk, Veracode and others in Software Composition Analysis (SCA).
To learn more, read our detailed Software Composition Analysis (SCA) Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."
  • "The price is okay."
  • "It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."
  • "Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."
  • "It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."
  • "I don't mind the price because I use the free version."
  • "We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."
  • "The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."
  • More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool helps to integrate CI/CD pipeline deployments. It is very easy to learn. Its security model is good.
    Top Answer:For small-scale usage, GitLab offers a free tier. For enterprise pricing, GitLab is more expensive than GitHub, as it's not as widely adopted. GitLab is the preferred choice for many developers… more »
    Top Answer:GitLab could consider introducing a code-scanning tool. Purchasing such tools from external markets can incur charges, which might not be favorable. Integrating these features into GitLab would… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    2,967
    Comparisons
    2,446
    Reviews
    50
    Average Words per Review
    402
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    32
    Comparisons
    22
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Microsoft Azure DevOps logo
    Compared 48% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Fuzzit
    Learn More
    OverOps
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster. 

    It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring. 

    With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

    OverOps captures code-level insight about application quality in real time to help DevOps teams deliver reliable software. Operating in any environment, OverOps employs both static and dynamic code analysis to collect unique data about every error and exception – both caught and uncaught – as well as performance slowdowns. This deep visibility into an application’s functional quality not only helps developers more effectively identify the true root cause of an issue, but also empowers ITOps to detect anomalies and improve overall reliability.

    Sample Customers
    1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
    TripAdvisor, COMCAST, intuit, LOVELAND, FOX, COX AUTOMOTIVE, fuze, plantronics, zynga, nielsen, cotiviti, vivint
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization25%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise52%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Synopsys, Snyk, Veracode and others in Software Composition Analysis (SCA). Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitLab is ranked 6th in Software Composition Analysis (SCA) with 70 reviews while OverOps is ranked 31st in Software Composition Analysis (SCA). GitLab is rated 8.6, while OverOps is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". On the other hand, GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline, SonarQube and Tekton, whereas OverOps is most compared with .

    See our list of best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors.

    We monitor all Software Composition Analysis (SCA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.