Compare GitLab vs. Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Accurics Logo
178 views|73 comparisons
GitLab Logo
8,369 views|7,375 comparisons
Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle Logo
21,217 views|11,789 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
501,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month.""The price is okay.""It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses.""Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."

More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Pricing is comparable with some of the other products. We are happy with the pricing.""The price is good. We certainly get a lot more in return. However, it's also hard to get the funds to roll out such a product for the entire firm. Therefore, pricing has been a limiting factor for us. However, it's a fair price.""The license fee may be a bit harder for startups to justify. But it will save you a headache later as well as peace of mind. Additionally, it shows your own customers that you value security stuff and will protect yourselves from any licensing issues, which is good marketing too.""In addition to the license fee for IQ Server, you have to factor in some running costs. We use AWS, so we spun up an additional VM to run this. If the database is RDS that adds a little bit extra too. Of course someone could run it on a pre-existing VM or physical server to reduce costs. I should add that compared to the license fee, the running costs are so minimal they had no effect on our decision to use IQ Server.""Pricing is decent. It's not horrible. It's middle-of-the-road, as far as our ranking goes. They're a little bit more but that's also because they provide more.""Lifecycle, to the best of my recollection, had the best pricing compared with other solutions.""Cost is a drawback. It's somewhat costly.""It's expensive, but you get what you pay for. There were no problems with the base license and how they do it. It was transparent. You don't have to worry. You can scan to your heart's delight."

More Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.
501,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: I have had no problem with the stability of the solution.
Top Answer: Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes… more »
Top Answer: The solution could improve by providing more integration into the CI/CD pipeline, an autocomplete search tool, and more… more »
Top Answer: The component piece, where you can analyze the component, is the most valuable. You can pull the component up and you… more »
Top Answer: I'm not familiar with the pricing in detail, but I believe it was pretty reasonably priced, compared to the market.
Top Answer: One thing that it is lacking, one thing I don't like, is that when you label something or add a status to it, you do it… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Nexus Lifecycle
Learn More
Overview

At Accurics™, we envision a world where organizations can innovate in the cloud with confidence. Our mission is to enable cyber resilience through self-healing as organizations embrace cloud native infrastructure. The Accurics platform self-heals cloud native infrastructure by codifying security throughout the development lifecycle. It programmatically detects and resolves risks across Infrastructure as Code before infrastructure is provisioned, and maintains the secure posture in runtime by programmatically mitigating risks from changes. Accurics enables organizations of all sizes to achieve cloud cyber resilience through free cloud-based and open source tools such as Terrascan™.

GitLab is a single application with features for the whole software development and operations (DevOps) lifecycle.

Nexus Lifecycle gives you full control over your software supply chain and allows you to define rules, actions, and policies that work best for your organization and teams.

Offer
Learn more about Accurics
Learn more about GitLab
Learn more about Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle
Sample Customers
Automation Anywhere, NBA, GroundTruth, ServiceMax, Navis, Edcast
Siemens, University of Washington, Equinix, Paessler AG, CNCF, Ticketmaster, CERN, Vaadin
Genome.One, Blackboard, Crediterform, Crosskey, Intuit, Progress Software, Qualys, Liberty Mutual Insurance
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company6%
REVIEWERS
Mining And Metals Company25%
Computer Software Company25%
Transportation Company13%
Financial Services Firm13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider22%
Government8%
Financial Services Firm7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm33%
Insurance Company19%
Manufacturing Company10%
Computer Software Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Financial Services Firm16%
Comms Service Provider13%
Insurance Company7%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise71%
REVIEWERS
Small Business54%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise31%
REVIEWERS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise56%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise54%
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
501,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

GitLab is ranked 4th in Software Composition Analysis (SCA) with 12 reviews while Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle is ranked 1st in Software Composition Analysis (SCA) with 18 reviews. GitLab is rated 8.4, while Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Provides or mandates quantitative code into the Master". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle writes "Checks our libraries for security and licensing issues". GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Tekton, TeamCity, Bamboo and GoCD, whereas Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle is most compared with SonarQube, Black Duck, WhiteSource, JFrog Xray and Veracode Software Composition Analysis. See our GitLab vs. Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle report.

See our list of best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors.

We monitor all Software Composition Analysis (SCA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.