Compare Global-active Device vs. Hitachi Universal Replicator
Sponsored
 | Christian Gruetzner Service Architecture at All for One Group AG |
Use Global-active Device? Share your opinion.
Use Hitachi Universal Replicator? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, HVR Software, Dell EMC and others in Data Replication. Updated: February 2021.
465,623 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"They allow a special price if you are working closely with them. Since we have a lot of NetApp systems, we got some kind of discount. That's something they do for other customers, not just for us. The price was fair. In addition to the licensing fees, you're paying Amazon for your usage..."
"The standard pricing is online. Pricing depends. If you're using the PayGo model, then it's just the normal costs on the Microsoft page. If you're using Bring Your Own License, which is what we're doing, then you get with your sales contact at NetApp and start figuring out what price is the best, in the end, for your company."
"In addition to the standard licensing fees, there are fees for Azure, the VMs themselves and for data transfer."
"Cloud is cloud. It's still expensive. Any good solution comes with a price tag. That's where we are looking to see how well we can manage our data in the cloud by trying to optimize the costs."
"I know the licensing is a bit on the high-end. That's when we had to downsize our MetroCluster disks and just migrate to disks that were half used. We migrated into those just to reduce maintenance costs."
"Cost is a big factor, because a lot of companies can't afford enterprise grade equipment all the time. They skimp where they can. I would recommend that they improve the cost."
"Our licensing costs are folded into the hardware purchases and I have never differentiated between the two."
"For NetApp it's about $20,000 for a single node and $30,000 for the HA."
Information Not Available
Information Not Available
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.
465,623 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO
The leading enterprise-grade storage management solution, delivers secure, proven storage management services and supports up to a capacity of 368TB. Software service supports various use cases, such as: File shares and block-level storage serving NAS (NFS, SMB / CIFS) and SAN (iSCSI) Disaster Recovery, Backup, and Archive DevOps Databases (SQL, Oracle, NoSQL) Cloud Volumes ONTAP is offered in a standard single-node configuration or in a High Availability (HA) configuration.
Depend on the global-active device feature of Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS RF) to ensure continuous operations across multiple locations. Simplify data consistency, availability and protection. Up to three-site geographic protection supports the strictest service levels. Provide your business with the solution trusted by 87% of Fortune 100 financial companies.
Hitachi Universal Replicator satisfies the most demanding business continuity and disaster recovery requirements. This software asynchronously replicates data between Hitachi storage systems, over any distance.
Take Control with Unified Cloud Storage
Sign up for a 30-day trial to see how Cloud Volumes ONTAP can help you optimize cloud storage costs and performance, while enhancing data enterprise-grade protection, security, and compliance - wherever your data lives.
Learn more about Global-active Device
Learn more about Hitachi Universal Replicator
Rohit, AdvacnedMD, D2L, Trinity Mirror, Eidos Media, WireStorm, Cordant Group, JFK Medical Center, ALD Automotive, Healthix, City of Baton Rouge, ON Semiconductor
BMW Group, Datev, Turk Telecom, Tel Aviv Stock Exchange
Shandong Telecom
Healthcare Company26%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Computer Software Company10%
Comms Service Provider10%
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider21%
Manufacturing Company10%
Media Company6%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Small Business7%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise80%
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise74%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, HVR Software, Dell EMC and others in Data Replication. Updated: February 2021.
465,623 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Global-active Device is ranked 20th in Data Replication while Hitachi Universal Replicator is ranked 13th in Data Replication. Global-active Device is rated 0.0, while Hitachi Universal Replicator is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Global-active Device is most compared with , whereas Hitachi Universal Replicator is most compared with Hitachi TrueCopy and Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors and best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.