Compare Global-active Device vs. HPE Disaster Recovery Services

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
20th
out of 27 in Data Replication
Views
42
Comparisons
26
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
64
Comparisons
36
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, HVR Software, Dell EMC and others in Data Replication. Updated: February 2021.
465,623 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
HP Disaster Recovery Services
Learn More
Overview

Depend on the global-active device feature of Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS RF) to ensure continuous operations across multiple locations. Simplify data consistency, availability and protection. Up to three-site geographic protection supports the strictest service levels. Provide your business with the solution trusted by 87% of Fortune 100 financial companies.

HPE Disaster Recovery Services works with Zerto Virtual Replication (ZVR) software that enables rapid recovery from unplanned outages in times ranging from minutes and with minimal data loss measured in seconds. ZVR is a hypervisor based, storage independent disaster recovery solution that does continuous data replication from the source site to the recovery site, supports fully orchestrated and automated failover, failback and non-disruptive DR testing for production workloads and is the backbone of an always-on, continuously available deployment.
Offer
Learn more about Global-active Device
Learn more about HPE Disaster Recovery Services
Sample Customers
BMW Group, Datev, Turk Telecom, Tel Aviv Stock Exchange
MTS Ukraine, TrerĀ Innovation
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, HVR Software, Dell EMC and others in Data Replication. Updated: February 2021.
465,623 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Global-active Device is ranked 20th in Data Replication while HPE Disaster Recovery Services is ranked 13th in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Global-active Device is rated 0.0, while HPE Disaster Recovery Services is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Global-active Device is most compared with , whereas HPE Disaster Recovery Services is most compared with Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines.

See our list of .

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.