Global-active device vs IBM Softek TDMF comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hitachi Vantara Logo
115 views|90 comparisons
IBM Logo
88 views|47 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Global-active device and IBM Softek TDMF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Replication Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
18th
out of 31 in Data Replication
Views
115
Comparisons
90
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
21st
out of 31 in Data Replication
Views
88
Comparisons
47
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Data Replication
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication. Updated: April 2024.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Softek TDMF
Learn More
Overview

Depend on the global-active device feature of Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS RF) to ensure continuous operations across multiple locations. Simplify data consistency, availability and protection. Up to three-site geographic protection supports the strictest service levels. Provide your business with the solution trusted by 87% of Fortune 100 financial companies.

IBM Data Mobility Services Ð Softek Transparent Data Migration Facility (TDMF) z/OS uses skilled experts for a more reliable data migration, helping reduce the risk of disruptions or outages and enabling continuous application availability.
Sample Customers
BMW Group, Datev, Turk Telecom, Tel Aviv Stock Exchange
BT
Buyer's Guide
Data Replication
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication. Updated: April 2024.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Global-active device is ranked 18th in Data Replication while IBM Softek TDMF is ranked 21st in Data Replication. Global-active device is rated 0.0, while IBM Softek TDMF is rated 10.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Softek TDMF writes "It very easy to setup and manage unless you have network problems". Global-active device is most compared with Hitachi TrueCopy, whereas IBM Softek TDMF is most compared with .

See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.