Compare Global-active Device vs. IBM Softek TDMF

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Global-active Device Logo
36 views|21 comparisons
IBM Softek TDMF Logo
253 views|173 comparisons
Ranking
20th
out of 27 in Data Replication
Views
36
Comparisons
21
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
10th
out of 27 in Data Replication
Views
253
Comparisons
173
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, HVR Software, Dell EMC and others in Data Replication. Updated: February 2021.
464,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Softek TDMF
Learn More
Overview

Depend on the global-active device feature of Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS RF) to ensure continuous operations across multiple locations. Simplify data consistency, availability and protection. Up to three-site geographic protection supports the strictest service levels. Provide your business with the solution trusted by 87% of Fortune 100 financial companies.

IBM Data Mobility Services Ð Softek Transparent Data Migration Facility (TDMF) z/OS uses skilled experts for a more reliable data migration, helping reduce the risk of disruptions or outages and enabling continuous application availability.
Offer
Learn more about Global-active Device
Learn more about IBM Softek TDMF
Sample Customers
BMW Group, Datev, Turk Telecom, Tel Aviv Stock Exchange
BT
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, HVR Software, Dell EMC and others in Data Replication. Updated: February 2021.
464,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Global-active Device is ranked 20th in Data Replication while IBM Softek TDMF is ranked 10th in Data Replication. Global-active Device is rated 0.0, while IBM Softek TDMF is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Global-active Device is most compared with , whereas IBM Softek TDMF is most compared with Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.