Global-active device vs Lumen SafeHaven comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Global-active device and Lumen SafeHaven based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
31
Comparisons
24
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
33
Comparisons
30
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
SafeHaven, SafeHaven DRaaS, CenturyLink SafeHaven
Learn More
Overview

Depend on the global-active device feature of Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS RF) to ensure continuous operations across multiple locations. Simplify data consistency, availability and protection. Up to three-site geographic protection supports the strictest service levels. Provide your business with the solution trusted by 87% of Fortune 100 financial companies.

CenturyLink SafeHaven DRaaS offers an efficient way to protect your enterprise data and production systems - easily and affordably.

Sample Customers
BMW Group, Datev, Turk Telecom, Tel Aviv Stock Exchange
Seattle Seahawks, tipico, serco
Buyer's Guide
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Global-active device is ranked 35th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software while Lumen SafeHaven is ranked 16th in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Global-active device is rated 0.0, while Lumen SafeHaven is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Global-active device is most compared with Hitachi TrueCopy, whereas Lumen SafeHaven is most compared with .

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.