Global-active device vs RecoverGuard comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hitachi Vantara Logo
28 views|22 comparisons
Continuity Software Logo
17 views|8 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Global-active device and RecoverGuard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
28
Comparisons
22
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
17
Comparisons
8
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software. Updated: April 2024.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Depend on the global-active device feature of Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS RF) to ensure continuous operations across multiple locations. Simplify data consistency, availability and protection. Up to three-site geographic protection supports the strictest service levels. Provide your business with the solution trusted by 87% of Fortune 100 financial companies.

The RecoverGuard enterprise-grade solution proactively verifies that recovery and backup copies of data are stored in a secure, immutable and isolated manner and that cyber-recoverability architecture and configuration best-practices are followed and are in compliance with regulations, standards and RPO requirements.

Sample Customers
BMW Group, Datev, Turk Telecom, Tel Aviv Stock Exchange
Certsys, CloudZone, El Al Airlines
Buyer's Guide
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software. Updated: April 2024.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Global-active device is ranked 36th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software while RecoverGuard is ranked 38th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software. Global-active device is rated 0.0, while RecoverGuard is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Global-active device is most compared with Hitachi TrueCopy, whereas RecoverGuard is most compared with .

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.