GNU GNATS vs NMQA QABook comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GNU Logo
26 views|10 comparisons
NMQA Logo
19 views|8 comparisons
Ranking
4th
out of 8 in Defect Tracking
Views
26
Comparisons
10
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
6th
out of 8 in Defect Tracking
Views
19
Comparisons
8
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
GNATS
QABook
Learn More
NMQA
Video Not Available
Overview
GNU GNATS is a set of tools for tracking bugs reported by users to a central site. It allows problem report management and communication with users via various means. GNATS stores all the information about problem reports in its databases and provides tools for querying, editing, and maintenance of the databases. Thanks to its architecture, GNATS is not bound to a single user interface - it can be used via command line, e-mail, Emacs, or a network daemon, usually used with a Web interface. Together with the fact that all GNATS databases and configuration can be stored in plain text files, it allows easy use and provides good flexibility. Basically, if the GNATS tools do not provide everything you need, you can add your own additional utilities using standard GNU tools.
Test management product that is offered on premises or in the cloud via desktop, Microsoft SharePoint, or the web.
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Capgemini, Queensland Government, Etihad Airways, CGI

GNU GNATS is ranked 4th in Defect Tracking while NMQA QABook is ranked 6th in Defect Tracking. GNU GNATS is rated 0.0, while NMQA QABook is rated 0.0. On the other hand, GNU GNATS is most compared with , whereas NMQA QABook is most compared with .

See our list of best Defect Tracking vendors.

We monitor all Defect Tracking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.