Compare GNU Make vs. Travis CI

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GNU Make Logo
486 views|377 comparisons
Travis CI Logo
812 views|733 comparisons
Ranking
16th
out of 32 in Build Automation
Views
486
Comparisons
377
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
15th
out of 32 in Build Automation
Views
812
Comparisons
733
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: September 2021.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Travis CI
Video Not Available
Overview
Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.
Easily sync your GitHub projects with Travis CI and you'll be testing your code in minutes. Travis CI for private repositories has plans for every size project. With Travis CI testing your open source project is 100% free.
Offer
Learn more about GNU Make
Learn more about Travis CI
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Facebook, Heroku, Mozilla, Zendesk, twitter, Rails
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider19%
Media Company15%
Government7%
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: September 2021.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.

GNU Make is ranked 16th in Build Automation while Travis CI is ranked 15th in Build Automation. GNU Make is rated 0.0, while Travis CI is rated 0.0. On the other hand, GNU Make is most compared with Jenkins, whereas Travis CI is most compared with Tekton, GitLab, Jenkins, SemaphoreCI and Harness.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.