We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Google App Engine vs. Microsoft Azure

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Google App Engine Logo
4,401 views|3,737 comparisons
Microsoft Azure Logo
52,397 views|43,115 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon, Salesforce and others in PaaS Clouds. Updated: November 2021.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Google App Engine's most valuable feature is self-management. You do not have to manage the infrastructure underneath where all the functions are happening, such as load balancing deployment and version management, they are managed by the system itself.""Seurity features - unauthorized individuals are unable to access certain applications."

More Google App Engine Pros »

"My experience with technical support so far is very good.""There are many useful features. We use web apps, so instead of starting a web server, we just have machines running some web services. This was helpful for us in terms of the scalability of the application. We also use Active Directory for authentication and some services for the data backup. It is a very good and reliable solution. It was easy to implement this solution. It fits very well into our plans and covers our needs to provide infrastructure in the cloud. The portal to configure new resources is very easy, and it is very easy to allocate new resources.""We've got multiple tools on Azure, which is a very good feature of Azure. Our Palo Alto firewall and other things are hosted in Azure. We're using Sentinel as well, which is a security tool that is being used by our SOC teams. I've also used AWS, and I find Azure to be more Windows-driven. Although Azure is newer as compared to AWS, it is growing fast. Microsoft is working towards the betterment of Azure.""The solution is easy to use and flexible.""The time to market is fast compared back to the traditional on-premise hosting. That is one of the better things I can say because there is no need to worry. The Pack services will enable it to start immediately.""We didn't have any problems setting it up.""It was very user-friendly when setting up the virtual machines and console. It was an easy task for my team to create virtual servers and start replications.""The management part of it is good. Its UI is simple to use. The cost management and billing part is also good. These are the top things that I like in Azure."

More Microsoft Azure Pros »

Cons
"Difficult to assess how pricing is managed.""The only concern is that there is a number of the offerings which are built on their own proprietary technologies. With some of the offerings in Google Cloud, it's difficult to have a path to migrate to other cloud providers."

More Google App Engine Cons »

"At this point, the latency is too high to use Azure in our production environment.""The pricing in our region can be a bit high.""I would like to see improved migration tools. It is improving week by week. They just need to make sure that they keep up with the new functionality provided in other clouds.""Integration with other services could be much better.""I would like it if Microsoft communicated better about upcoming changes before they roll them out. Sometimes when Microsoft implements changes, they don't notify the users promptly enough. I would like to know about new features, especially Office 365.""Microsoft Azure could improve by being more user-friendly and the interface could be better.""I believe that some of the services need to be available on the on-premises version and not only based on the cloud.""I would like to see the console improved."

More Microsoft Azure Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Customers pay for our software and use our solution as a service through monthly payments. They don't pay the licensing fee directly to Microsoft.""It is competitive with other public cloud providers, and its price is very close to different cloud providers. There is not a noticeable difference between different cloud providers. Otherwise, it would be a risk for them to have services that were much more expensive than their competition. They're pretty much neck to neck on pricing.""I am currently on a pay-as-you-go subscription and my customers are going to be on a three-year contract. For what is offered in the three-year package it is quite reasonably priced.""We are on a monthly subscription for Microsoft Azure and the cost is more expensive than some of the competitors, such as Amazon AWS. They should be more competitive with other solutions.""It is important to consider ROI when looking at the cost of a subscription.""The pricing of Microsoft Azure is not very flexible.""Microsoft Azure is more expensive than other solutions, such as GCP. We have found that GCP offers more utilities at a very reasonable price.""The pricing for the end-user packages is a bit high. It is full of very interesting services, but I would still like it to be less expensive."

More Microsoft Azure Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity… more »
Top Answer: One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with both… more »
Top Answer: I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure… more »
Ranking
12th
out of 31 in PaaS Clouds
Views
4,401
Comparisons
3,737
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
320
Rating
8.0
1st
out of 31 in PaaS Clouds
Views
52,397
Comparisons
43,115
Reviews
134
Average Words per Review
422
Rating
8.3
Comparisons
Also Known As
Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure
Learn More
Overview

Google App Engine is a Platform-as-a-Service (Paas) provider that equips web application developers with all the resources and tools that they need to develop, test, and run their applications on Google's infrastructure. Everything is built into the kit, so with one download of the SDK, you'll be well on your way to first-rate apps.

Windows Azure is Microsoft's cloud platform where developers can create, deploy, and maintain their apps. This cloud application platform allows developers to concentrate on the actual applications, while it takes care of all the elements behind the apps.

Windows Azure offers open across multiple frameworks,languages, and tools. It is fully scalable, localized in that it is hosted globally in many datacenters, and has widespread capabilities are, catering for all elements of application development, deployment, and management.

Azure is comprised of several different service modules,including Infrastructure; Web; Mobile; Dev & Test; Big Data; Media;Storage, Backup & Recovery; and Identity & Access Management.

Offer
Learn more about Google App Engine
Learn more about Microsoft Azure
Sample Customers
Khan Academy, Best Buy, Gigya, MetOffice, Getaround, Mimiboard, NewsLimited, WebFilings, and CloudLock.
BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company33%
Media Company22%
Manufacturing Company11%
Non Profit11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm28%
Comms Service Provider18%
Computer Software Company15%
Energy/Utilities Company12%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company21%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company8%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm7%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business50%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise17%
REVIEWERS
Small Business40%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise44%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise64%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon, Salesforce and others in PaaS Clouds. Updated: November 2021.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Google App Engine is ranked 12th in PaaS Clouds with 2 reviews while Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in PaaS Clouds with 151 reviews. Google App Engine is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Azure is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Google App Engine writes "Ability to test before deployment and security authorization are key features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "This helps us meet multiple requirements other PaaS solutions do not but there is a lot of room for improvement". Google App Engine is most compared with Amazon AWS, Pivotal Cloud Foundry, Amazon Lightsail, Heroku and IBM Public Cloud, whereas Microsoft Azure is most compared with Oracle Cloud Platform, Amazon AWS, Google Firebase, Pivotal Cloud Foundry and Heroku.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.