Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs IBM SoftLayer comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Google Logo
2,009 views|1,768 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
154 views|104 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Storage Nearline and IBM SoftLayer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services.
To learn more, read our detailed Public Cloud Storage Services Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The data structure and the types of data that are supported are very good.""Google is always introducing new features and tends to have a new release every month.""I find the flexibility in storing documents or data and the ease of retrieval valuable with this solution.""It provides the necessary support and flexibility to manage data storage effectively, especially during times of variable data flow.""It can isolate files and stop them from corrupting other files.""The most valuable feature of Nearline is the access. It's helpful to move data that is generated once a month, such as salary information, to Nearline.""The capacity and space on offer are excellent.""Nearline is highly stable."

More Google Cloud Storage Nearline Pros →

"The stability is the solution's most valuable aspect for our organization.""The ELT versus ETL extract, transform and load versus extract, load, and then transform, the ELT method is what really sells SoftLayer."

More IBM SoftLayer Pros →

Cons
"The pricing is quite high.""The interface for managing file storage in the buckets could be improved.""Nearline security could be better. The solution could integrate better with SEIM tools.""The UI could be a little bit more effective.""The suggestion for improvement primarily revolves around cost efficiency.""They need a better, more visual, user interface for folders and files.""They should provide more options or flexibility in terms of pricing.""The solution needs to offer better System Information and Event Management (SEIM). I'd like to discover how we could implement something like that within Google's cloud."

More Google Cloud Storage Nearline Cons →

"For us, the versioning was an issue.""The interface is hard to use for us. It should be simplified."

More IBM SoftLayer Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Right now, for the number of servers and the storage that I have, I would say I'm charged between $125 and $150 per month."
  • "Google Cloud Storage Nearline is very inexpensive. It costs us less than $50 a month to store our files. We use approximately 10 terabytes. Overall, I would rate the product a five out of five for affordability."
  • More Google Cloud Storage Nearline Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Nearline is the access. It's helpful to move data that is generated once a month, such as salary information, to Nearline.
    Top Answer:The pricing of the different storage classes is hard to compare. The higher the zone, the higher the price. The advantage is that you can access the data frequently, and the speed of the response is… more »
    Top Answer:The UI could be a little bit more effective. Now, the UI is just a white background, but it's really helpful if there are options to change the theme. I prefer that.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    2,009
    Comparisons
    1,768
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    557
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    154
    Comparisons
    104
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CloudLayer
    Learn More
    Overview

    A low-cost, highly-durable and highly available storage service for infrequently accessed data, data archiving, online backup and disaster recovery. Data is available instantly, not within hours or days. With sub-second average response times and 1 cent per GB/month pricing, Cloud Storage Nearline gives you terrific performance at a low cost.

    SoftLayer provides cloud infrastructure as a service from a growing number of data centers and network points of presence around the world. Our customers range from Web startups to global enterprises.

    Products and services include bare metal and virtual servers, networking, turnkey big data solutions, private cloud solutions, and more. Our unique advantages include the industry's first Network-Within-a-Network topology for true out-of-band access, and an easy-to-use customer portal and robust API for full remote-access of all product and service management options.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Whogohost Ltd., Skypicker, Infinity Computers and Communications Company, Grace Co. Ltd., Keyword, Uvionics Tech, Tennis Australia, immixGroup, Salesbox, Cxense ASA, Avnet Inc., Komsomolskaya Pravda, Seekr
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Educational Organization7%
    Retailer6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business63%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise62%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Public Cloud Storage Services
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services. Updated: April 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Google Cloud Storage Nearline is ranked 13th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 8 reviews while IBM SoftLayer is ranked 22nd in Public Cloud Storage Services. Google Cloud Storage Nearline is rated 8.2, while IBM SoftLayer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage Nearline writes "Provides APIs for everything and has good protection through encryption". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM SoftLayer writes "Stable with excellent speed and agility". Google Cloud Storage Nearline is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, Amazon S3, Wasabi, Microsoft Azure File Storage and Microsoft Azure Block Storage, whereas IBM SoftLayer is most compared with Amazon AWS.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.