We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Storage and Oracle Cloud Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services."On the phone, I appreciate how seamless it is."
"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Storage is the shared folder."
"I could store any type of file using the solution."
"The solution is easy to use."
"Everything I store in the solution is available on all of my devices."
"There's no implementation process."
"I have more than enough personal storage and have had no security issues."
"Google Cloud Storage is easy to use, and it's free. I also enjoy the speed I am able to share with family across the globe. The storage is synced."
"The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security."
"The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use."
"One key feature is that you can make buckets private, requiring pre-authentication and using a specific URL for access. Additionally, the buckets are encrypted by default. The flexibility of public or private buckets and how you grant access are vital security features."
"I don't find the solution very user-friendly."
"It would be helpful to offer more packages to increase the storage."
"The solution only allows so much space for free."
"It is stable, but it can always be more stable."
"I would prefer more support for alternative operating systems like DSD. The performance could be better because sometimes there are glitches. The price could be better."
"An area for improvement is that when you share with others, they can see all your folders instead of just those you share. Only the folders you specifically share should be visible."
"It is hard to migrate to another product if we want to."
"The solution must provide some accessibility features."
"Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security."
"The solution should provide more customization and the possibility of doing more manual tasks."
"Sometimes, there are glitches with applying policies. Even when the policy is correct, it might not work consistently. We need to troubleshoot to see if it's a user error or if the policy itself needs adjustment. It usually works after refreshing, but that inconsistency is a minor complexity."
Google Cloud Storage is ranked 4th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 66 reviews while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is ranked 15th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 3 reviews. Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Flexible, reliable, and beneficial for small sized companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Object Storage writes "A scalable solution that helps to store and share files securely ". Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, AT&T Cloud Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Google Workspace and Dropbox, whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Object Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Oracle Database Backup Service and Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store).
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
