We performed a comparison between Google Cloud and Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."For us, the solution is very easy to use. We have the right skillsets for it."
"It's easy to work with."
"The solution is user-friendly and easy to spin."
"Google Cloud is 100 percent stable."
"I like that it is simple to use."
"It didn't take long to get everything set up and understand what was going on. Things are pretty clear."
"What I like most about Google Cloud is its stability. I also like that its GUI works fine for my company."
"Good storage and ease of access."
"The most valuable feature of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is the UI console. We are able to receive the resources from the console directly."
"Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensure application setup and recovery by utilizing two separate clusters on OpenShift."
"In general, customers appreciate its ability to run different workloads, manage applications through CI/CD pipelines like Jenkins, and leverage tools like Helm charts and Kako."
"The deployment mechanism has become more dynamic with the use of the product."
"The portability, moving from one platform to another, is easy."
"The solution offers the most robust Kubernetes orchestration available."
"The initial setup is easy."
"I would like to see some improvement in the accessibility features of this solution."
"My only concern is that a number of the offerings are built on their own proprietary technologies which means means that, with respect to the offerings in Google Cloud, it's difficult to have a path to migrate to other cloud providers."
"I consider Azure more secure than Google and Amazon because of all its certifications, but Google is secure enough and improving."
"The solution could be a bit cheaper."
"The price can be lowered significantly."
"It is complex to set up."
"Google Cloud would benefit from more detailed practical hands-on training especially in your mother tongue, not just English."
"Google Cloud could improve the integration with other solutions."
"There is room for improvement in cluster-based queue monitoring and autoscaling."
"The service mesh integrations could improve the solution."
"The general purpose solution tries to cater to too many customers so it is heavy."
"Technical support could be a bit better."
"The effectiveness is satisfactory, and there haven't been any additional fees due to meeting demands. However, there's room for improvement in pricing, performance, and stability. Regarding the UI, it could be more user-friendly and integrated with various platforms. Currently, the UI lacks user-friendliness, especially for developers unfamiliar with container technology. Expecting them to create YAML files for security purposes is unrealistic without proper guidance or experience. This aspect needs improvement."
"The installation and configuration procedure should be simplified."
"Making it even more cost-effective could be explored."
More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →
Google Cloud is ranked 5th in PaaS Clouds with 66 reviews while Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is ranked 16th in PaaS Clouds with 7 reviews. Google Cloud is rated 8.2, while Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Google Cloud writes "Great for big data with off-the-charts scalability for storage and databases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud writes "Communication can be built on any cloud and that is a big advantage for customers". Google Cloud is most compared with Linode, Alibaba Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and Heroku, whereas Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is most compared with Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS. See our Google Cloud vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.