We performed a comparison between Google Cloud and SAP S4HANA on AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The stability is good with Google Cloud."
"The solution can scale."
"It is very easy to share documents."
"Google Meet is simple to use regarding configuration and recording sessions."
"The customer service team for this solution is very knowledgeable."
"You can just connect and start using it through a browser within a few minutes."
"Google Cloud is very user-friendly."
"The solution's features are very good and our staff loves using them."
"The product efficiently manages the data center without manual intervention."
"I would rate this solution as a nine out of ten because it covers all the fields, has a big maturity, and has something other solutions are missing, which is speed."
"With extensive data and a sizable client base, this ensures seamless operations, responsiveness, and overall reliability, addressing our enterprise-scale needs effectively."
"The product’s high availability is its best feature."
"I like that they are very familiar with our VM which makes it easy to use."
"The HANA database is a valuable feature"
"SAP S4HANA on AWS is an easy-to-use solution."
"Technical support is very good from SAP and AWS...Scalability is always available in the solution...With a stable environment, it should be running very nicely."
"The documentation could be better."
"Google Cloud could improve the integration with other solutions."
"I would like to see Google Cloud become more competitive when it comes to price."
"Its integration with one of the third-party platforms could be better."
"I consider Azure more secure than Google and Amazon because of all its certifications, but Google is secure enough and improving."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
"It is complex to set up."
"My only concern is that a number of the offerings are built on their own proprietary technologies which means means that, with respect to the offerings in Google Cloud, it's difficult to have a path to migrate to other cloud providers."
"The drawback of this tool versus an on-site tool is that you've got to upgrade the tool. The software is upgraded as it gets upgraded and you've got to be ready to change whatever processes and do whatever training you need to do."
"There are times when the solution can become slower. The stability could improve."
"The manufacturing application system, it's not as user-friendly in S4HANA."
"There are a few complexities when it comes to licensing that could be simplified."
"Doesn't have a common development environment."
"I would like scalability to be improved in the future for faster performance."
"The platform's front-end user interface needs improvement compared to other applications."
"The solution's overall enterprise support could be improved."
Google Cloud is ranked 4th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 66 reviews while SAP S4HANA on AWS is ranked 7th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 35 reviews. Google Cloud is rated 8.2, while SAP S4HANA on AWS is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Google Cloud writes "Great for big data with off-the-charts scalability for storage and databases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S4HANA on AWS writes "With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users". Google Cloud is most compared with Linode, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Alibaba Cloud, Pivotal Cloud Foundry and Amazon Lightsail, whereas SAP S4HANA on AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Amazon AWS and Alibaba Cloud. See our Google Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.