We performed a comparison between Google Cloud and VMware Tanzu Application Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is user-friendly and easy to spin."
"The solution is fairly easy to deploy."
"We can increase the storage as we need."
"I have found almost everything valuable. Most cloud products are moving in this direction, including artificial intelligence, blockchain, and security."
"Good storage and ease of access."
"Google Meet is simple to use regarding configuration and recording sessions."
"For us, the solution is very easy to use. We have the right skillsets for it."
"I like that it is free. It's easy to use, and it's reliable."
"There are a lot of services available in VMware Tanzu Application Service, such as databases and application servers. You have everything you need in one application and you do not need to search outside of the solution."
"The solution is integrated very well with a lot of other systems. Also, its GUI is very good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability to check the flow of all the different variants within our applications."
"Tanzu is easy to upgrade and scale, whether we're talking about horizontal or vertical scaling. It is as smooth as possible without any downtime. The platform maintenance, upgrading, and operations part is very smooth."
"The solution could be a bit cheaper."
"Uploading documents could be simplified."
"Workload management could be better. Their pricing could also be more flexible."
"Google is slower to support .NET."
"It would be nice if they could offer more free storage."
"Technical support needs help."
"The storage available for this solution could be improved, especially compared to a solution like Microsoft which offers 1 TB of storage. Google cloud offers only 30 GB."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
"The solution is currently focused on VMware infrastructure and I would like to see more options made available."
"The implementation is not easy, it is very complex and can take a day or two to complete."
"The solution's initial setup process was complex...The solution could benefit from improved customization and visibility for its users."
"Tanzu could provide more granular control over whatever networking is being done on the containers. I would also like to see a slightly more detailed view of application-level tracing. I'm referring to the connections between different microservices. If they added a service-matching feature, that would be helpful for the customers to build or be more effective."
More VMware Tanzu Application Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Google Cloud is ranked 5th in PaaS Clouds with 66 reviews while VMware Tanzu Application Service is ranked 11th in PaaS Clouds with 4 reviews. Google Cloud is rated 8.2, while VMware Tanzu Application Service is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Google Cloud writes "Great for big data with off-the-charts scalability for storage and databases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Application Service writes "A solution with a good GUI and the ability to integrate with other systems seamlessly". Google Cloud is most compared with Linode, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Alibaba Cloud and Pivotal Cloud Foundry, whereas VMware Tanzu Application Service is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, OpenShift, Pivotal Cloud Foundry and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). See our Google Cloud vs. VMware Tanzu Application Service report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.