We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Google cloud is less expensive than other comparable solutions."
"The licensing for Google Cloud seems to be quite cheap and they're actually quite reasonable in comparison to Azure, which, as it turns out, is quite expensive. Even though Azure has a data center in South Africa it's still quite costly. There's no scaling, so if you go with the VM, you pay 2500 Rand. When you add another VM, it's another 2500 Rand even though you don't use the whole thing. With Google, you can go up as incrementally as you need to, even if it's just 30 Rand."
"The best part of Google Cloud is that it is cheaper than the competitors."
Earn 20 points
Build scalable apps. Use Google's global, reliable infrastructure. Securely manage enterprise data. Get insights from data faster. Whatever you're solving for, Google Cloud can help.
A modern runtime for Java, .NET, and Node apps
VMware Tanzu Application Service is purpose-built for developers to boost feature velocity and for operations teams to deliver world-class uptime.
Google Cloud is ranked 8th in PaaS Clouds with 6 reviews while VMware Tanzu Application Service is ranked 15th in PaaS Clouds. Google Cloud is rated 8.6, while VMware Tanzu Application Service is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Google Cloud writes "A cloud service that will please more technically-minded users which is making strides with ease-of-use". On the other hand, Google Cloud is most compared with SAP Business One on AWS and Pivotal Cloud Foundry, whereas VMware Tanzu Application Service is most compared with OpenShift, Pivotal Cloud Foundry, Microsoft Azure, IBM Cloud Private and Oracle Developer Cloud Service.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.