We performed a comparison between Google Firebase and SAP S4HANA on AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a stable solution...It is a very scalable solution."
"The solution is useful for managing users and user authentication."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"If you are selling an app with extensive Firebase use, costs may go up."
"The most valuable feature of Google Firebase authentication and deployment."
"The solution is stable."
"Google Firebase is one I like a lot because it gives us a little bit more power and accessibility when it comes to publishing apps a lot quicker and for the needs that we have."
"Firebase offers encryption out of the box."
"The product efficiently manages the data center without manual intervention."
"The solution adds great value to any organization."
"We have found the retail business features to be the most valuable."
"They have their own instances where you can host your database."
"This product is currently the leading product within this category."
"SAP S4HANA's most valuable features include backup, security, storage, infrastructure, and enabling AI."
"The product’s high availability is its best feature."
"The internal integration within departments and integration with third parties is simplified in the system."
"The product is not that cheap."
"Google Firebase could improve the ability to create our own reports, other than what's available on the dashboard. For example, if we want to customize the report or export the data, this is a large task."
"Google Firebase should add extra functionality to do global delete and updates across your database."
"Firebase uses JSON, and the storage format is very different to that of SQL. This does not allow for easy migrations."
"The solution's notification system could be much better."
"I would prefer Google Firebase to focus more on its integration capabilities since it is an area in the solution with certain shortcomings."
"I would like to see faster data migration and some support for other languages in the next release."
"The initial setup is not exactly straightforward."
"There are a few complexities when it comes to licensing that could be simplified."
"The product could use more capabilities in the areas of robotics, machine learning and artificial intelligence, but these improvements are already on the way."
"Businesses are particularly interested in process automation, mobile, and web applications. These are the areas that SAP S4HANA is and should be looking to improve on, especially in terms of streamlining processes and automating certain steps."
"The manufacturing application system, it's not as user-friendly in S4HANA."
"SAP S4HANA could be improved by adding a click-to-deploy model."
"The GUI is age-old, the pricing is too high for hardware and older customizations are not working consistently."
"The pricing is a little bit high."
"Doesn't have a common development environment."
Google Firebase is ranked 5th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 32 reviews while SAP S4HANA on AWS is ranked 7th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 35 reviews. Google Firebase is rated 8.4, while SAP S4HANA on AWS is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Google Firebase writes "An application development solution that has a lot of services like storage, Firestore, and push notifications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S4HANA on AWS writes "With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users". Google Firebase is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, DigitalOcean, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Alibaba Cloud, whereas SAP S4HANA on AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Amazon AWS. See our Google Firebase vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.