We performed a comparison between Google Firebase and SAP S4HANA on AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a very stable solution."
"I love Firebase's notifications, crash analytics, and bug tracking. It gives you detailed reporting about app usage and users."
"The Realtime Database feature is the most important for us since we are able to see changes in the database the moment they are happening."
"The product is easy to use."
"Google Firebase has a lot of services like storage, Firestore, and push notifications."
"Allows us to create functions without any infrastructure apart from the Google App Engine."
"The initial setup of Google Firebase is pretty straightforward."
"It's stable."
"The most valuable features of SAP S4HANA on AWS are that it's simplified and the analytical capabilities are good."
"The most valuable feature of SAP S4HANA on AWS is the latency and speed. When we use the various typical relation database, the performance was visible."
"SAP S4HANA's most valuable features include backup, security, storage, infrastructure, and enabling AI."
"The system has the capacity to manage all these departments in a single box and they're all integrated."
"It is indeed a stable solution, but it depends on how you architecture the component in AWS. If the component has the right architecture and is properly provisioned and placed, then it will be a stable platform."
"The most valuable feature of SAP S4HANA on AWS is that when developed on a new structured system it can be configured."
"SAP has an auto-scaling feature, but Azure doesn't."
"Reporting transparency and user-friendliness are the key benefit of deploying SAP S4HANA on AWS. Furthermore, the solution offers a plethora of modules that have proven to be valuable, and there are regular updates available."
"There was no way of knowing how the rise in traffic would impact the price."
"Google Cloud Functions (which is still a BETA version) needs to have more control over the uploaded functions. That is, it needs more options for controlling the functions itself."
"One of the challenges I was facing when I was using it was the library called Google Dialogflow which allows you to connect your chatbot with an intent. So there is so much adding when you are trying to connect it with your service because you have to do a lot of repetition writing a new intent, putting it step by set so it is good to escape. I believe it should be flexible and dedicate the intents based on the relating and to write a lesser code when doing that."
"The UI for the realtime database could be simplified."
"The solution's notification system could be much better."
"Google Firebase should add extra functionality to do global delete and updates across your database."
"I rate the support from Google Firebase a four out of five."
"The product is not that cheap."
"The solution's overall enterprise support could be improved."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy."
"S4HANA is expensive. It costs much more than SuccessFactors."
"The documentation isn't clear enough."
"Not just S4 but for SAP in general, the price is a little high because they have implemented a new licensing scheme on a number of connections. The price being too expensive is some of the feedback we get from our customers."
"Doesn't have a common development environment."
"The drawback of this tool versus an on-site tool is that you've got to upgrade the tool. The software is upgraded as it gets upgraded and you've got to be ready to change whatever processes and do whatever training you need to do."
"The product's implementation phase can be very complex for customers."
Google Firebase is ranked 5th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 32 reviews while SAP S4HANA on AWS is ranked 7th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 35 reviews. Google Firebase is rated 8.4, while SAP S4HANA on AWS is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Google Firebase writes "An application development solution that has a lot of services like storage, Firestore, and push notifications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S4HANA on AWS writes "With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users". Google Firebase is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, DigitalOcean, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Alibaba Cloud, whereas SAP S4HANA on AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Amazon AWS. See our Google Firebase vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
