Google Kubernetes Engine vs Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Google Kubernetes Engine and Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) takes care of managing Kubernetes, including the main control plane. It also offers solutions for monitoring resources and handling external traffic, which is essential for us. Being a cloud-native solution, it relieves us from worrying about these operational aspects.""The solution is available across AWS, GCP and Azure and is seamless.""It's easy to manage and deploy. It's the best.""Stability-wise, this solution is really good.""The solution is more user-friendly than AWS or Azure. I can also easily scale out the service in the future when the number of customers grows. GKE is the leader of Kubernetes service and it can be easily updated. I love the tool's user interfaces.""Google Kubernetes Engine's most valuable features are microservices and its acquisition rate, which is very useful for scaling perspective.""The main advantage of GKE is that it is a managed service. This means that Google is responsible for managing the master node in the Kubernetes cluster system. As a result, we can focus on deploying applications to the slaves, while Google handles any updates and security patches. The fact that GKE is fully integrated into the Google ecosystem, including solutions such as BigQuery and VertexAI. This makes it easier for us to integrate these tools into our process. This integration ultimately speeds up our time to market and reduces the time and effort spent on managing infrastructure. The managed aspect of GKE allows us to simply deploy and utilize it without having to worry about the technicalities of infrastructure management.""We used automation for the initial setup. It was okay. So it wasn't too complex."

More Google Kubernetes Engine Pros →

"The benefit of working with the solution is the fact that it's very straightforward...It is a perfectly stable product since the details are very accurate.""I am impressed with the tool's visibility.""The technical support is good.""One of the most valuable features I found was the ability of this solution to map the network and show you the communication between your containers and your different nodes.""The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring feature.""The most valuable feature is the ability to share resources.""I like virtualization and all those tools that come with OpenShift. I also like Advanced Cluster Management and the built-in security.""It is easy to install and manage."

More Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes Pros →

Cons
"There is room for improvement in this solution. For example, auto-scaling can be complex. We expect it to be easier to set up and manage, even for our customers.""The product could be cheaper.""I would like the solution to integrate with another Kubernetes product. I would also like it to monitor other platforms. It needs to also include scale-up container in the tool's next release.""The product’s visible allocation feature needs improvement.""The monitoring part requires some serious improvements in Google Kubernetes Engine, as it does not have very good monitoring consoles.""Google Kubernetes Engine's cost should be improved because it is high.""An area in which Google Kubernetes Engine could improve is configuration.""The console for this solution could be improved because it is very limited."

More Google Kubernetes Engine Cons →

"The deprecation of APIs is a concern since the deprecation of APIs will cause issues for us every time we upgrade.""The solution's visibility and vulnerability prevention should be improved.""The testing process could be improved.""They're trying to convert it to the platform as a source. They are moving in the direction of Cloud Foundry so it can be easier for a developer to deploy it.""The solution lacks features when compared to some of the competitors such as Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and has room for improvement.""Red Hat is somewhat expensive.""The initial setup is pretty complex. There's a learning curve, and its cost varies across different environments. It's difficult.""The tool's command line and configuration are hard for us to understand and make deployment complex. It should also include zero trust, access control features and database connectivity."

More Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We are planning to use external support, and hire a commercial partner for it."
  • "This is an open source solution, so there is no pricing or licensing."
  • "Currently, it costs around $1000 per month which sorted our deployment. So once we get more clients, having a huge suffix, costs can go up."
  • "I would rate Kubernetes' pricing four out of five."
  • "The price for Google Kubernetes Engine could be lower - I'd rate its pricing at three out of five."
  • "It is competitive, and it is not expensive. It is almost competitive with AWS and the rest of the cloud solutions. We are spending around 3K USD per month. There are four projects that are currently running, and each one is incurring a cost of around 3K USD."
  • "The pricing for GKE is dependent on the type of machine or virtual machine (VM) that is selected for the nodes in the cluster. There is a degree of flexibility in choosing the specifications of the machine, such as the number of CPUs, GPUs, and so on. Google provides a variety of options, allowing the user to create the desired cluster composition. However, the cost can be quite steep when it comes to regional clusters, which are necessary for high availability and failover. This redundancy is crucial for businesses and is required to handle an increase in requests in case of any issues in one region, such as jumping to a different region in case of a failure in the Toronto region. While it may be tempting to choose the cheapest type of machines, this may result in a limited capacity and user numbers, requiring over-provisioning to handle additional requests, such as those for a web application."
  • "Its pricing is good. They bill us only per user. That's nice."
  • More Google Kubernetes Engine Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing model is moderate, meaning it is not very expensive."
  • "Red Hat offers two pricing options for their solution: a separate price, and a bundled price under the OpenShift Platform Plus."
  • "We purchase a yearly basis license for the solution."
  • More Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution simplified deployment, making it more automated. Previously, Docker required manual configuration, often done by developers on their computers. However, with Google Kubernetes Engine… more »
    Top Answer:The tool's configuration features need improvement.
    Top Answer:I like virtualization and all those tools that come with OpenShift. I also like Advanced Cluster Management and the built-in security.
    Top Answer:The solution's visibility and vulnerability prevention should be improved.
    Top Answer:Red Hat can be utilized for anything, including OpenShift, Kubernetes, dev environments, automation, banking, and many IT industries.
    Ranking
    10th
    Views
    1,734
    Comparisons
    1,355
    Reviews
    23
    Average Words per Review
    472
    Rating
    8.0
    15th
    out of 59 in Container Security
    Views
    2,829
    Comparisons
    2,259
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    508
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    GKE
    StackRox
    Learn More
    Red Hat
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Kubernetes Engine is a managed, production-ready environment for deploying containerized applications. It brings our latest innovations in developer productivity, resource efficiency, automated operations, and open source flexibility to accelerate your time to market.

    Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes is a Kubernetes-native container security solution that enables your organization to more securely build, deploy, and run cloud-native applications from anywhere. With its built-in security across the entire software development life cycle, you can lower your operational costs, reduce operational risk, and increase developer productivity while improving your security posture immediately. In addition, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security integrates with security tools and DevOps in an effort to help you mitigate threats and enforce security policies that minimize operational risk to your applications. It also enables you to provide developers with actionable, context-rich guidelines integrated into existing workflows, along with tooling to support developer productivity. The solution is suitable for small, medium, and large-sized companies.

    Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes Features

    Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Vulnerability management: With the Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes solution, you gain full visibility into your entire cloud-native landscape. The solution makes it possible for your organization to identify and remediate vulnerabilities in Kubernetes configurations and container images, as well as running applications. It also enables you to provide developers with clear and prioritized guidance on fixable vulnerabilities.
    • Configuration management: The solution makes configuration management easy. To identify missed best practices, you can understand how images, containers, and deployments are configured prior to running. It also allows you to leverage Kubernetes-native capabilities - like admission controllers - to prevent misconfigured workloads from deploying or running.
    • Compliance: Using Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes helps you manage compliance with standard-specific checks across CIS Benchmarks, NIST, PCI, and HIPAA, with more than 300 controls and continuous compliance assessments and one-click audit reporting.
    • Network segmentation: The solution enables you to enforce network policies by using the native capabilities in Kubernetes. You can simulate new policies, visualize existing ones, generate updated YAML files, and apply them directly to Kubernetes.
    • Multifactor risk profiling: With Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, you can use risk rankings by combining vulnerability (CVE) details with rich Kubernetes context and artifact data. This allows you to assess and prioritize risk across your entire environment. In turn, you can accelerate remediation times and productivity.
    • Threat detection and incident response: By combining custom policies, process allow lists, application and network baselines, and behavioral modeling to identify anomalous behavior, the solution enables you to protect your applications at runtime. You can then leverage Kubernetes-native enforcement capabilities to respond.

    Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Increases protection, scalability, and portability.
    • Eliminates blind spots.
    • Reduces time and costs.
    • Reduces the effort needed to implement security.
    • Streamlines security analysis, investigation, and remediation by using the rich context Kubernetes provides.
    • Provides scalability and resiliency native to Kubernetes

    Reviews from Real Users

    PeerSpot user Igor K., Owner/Full Stack Software Engineer at Maraphonic, Inc., says, “The solution allows teams to create their own virtual spaces and share resources. The most valuable feature is the ability to share resources.”

    Sample Customers
    Philips Lighting, Alpha Vertex, GroupBy, BQ
    City National Bank, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business47%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Container Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Google Kubernetes Engine is ranked 10th in Container Management with 31 reviews while Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes is ranked 15th in Container Security with 10 reviews. Google Kubernetes Engine is rated 8.0, while Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Google Kubernetes Engine writes "The auto-scaling feature helps during peak hours, but the support is not great". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes writes "Provides network mapping feature for visualizing container communication but complex setup ". Google Kubernetes Engine is most compared with Kubernetes, Linode, OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control and Rancher Labs, whereas Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, SUSE NeuVector, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security and Sysdig Secure.

    We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.