• Home
  • Google Kubernetes Engine vs. Weaveworks

Google Kubernetes Engine vs Weaveworks comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Google Logo

Google Kubernetes Engine

Read 32 Google Kubernetes Engine reviews
1,701 views|1,329 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Weaveworks Logo

Weaveworks

165 views|136 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Container Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Google Kubernetes Engine and Weaveworks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Dinesh-Patil
Good control plane management and seamless integration capabilities
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) takes care of managing Kubernetes, including the main control plane. It also offers solutions for monitoring... Read more →
Use Weaveworks?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We are planning to use external support, and hire a commercial partner for it."
  • "This is an open source solution, so there is no pricing or licensing."
  • "Currently, it costs around $1000 per month which sorted our deployment. So once we get more clients, having a huge suffix, costs can go up."
  • "I would rate Kubernetes' pricing four out of five."
  • "The price for Google Kubernetes Engine could be lower - I'd rate its pricing at three out of five."
  • "It is competitive, and it is not expensive. It is almost competitive with AWS and the rest of the cloud solutions. We are spending around 3K USD per month. There are four projects that are currently running, and each one is incurring a cost of around 3K USD."
  • "The pricing for GKE is dependent on the type of machine or virtual machine (VM) that is selected for the nodes in the cluster. There is a degree of flexibility in choosing the specifications of the machine, such as the number of CPUs, GPUs, and so on. Google provides a variety of options, allowing the user to create the desired cluster composition. However, the cost can be quite steep when it comes to regional clusters, which are necessary for high availability and failover. This redundancy is crucial for businesses and is required to handle an increase in requests in case of any issues in one region, such as jumping to a different region in case of a failure in the Toronto region. While it may be tempting to choose the cheapest type of machines, this may result in a limited capacity and user numbers, requiring over-provisioning to handle additional requests, such as those for a web application."
  • "Its pricing is good. They bill us only per user. That's nice."

    • More Google Kubernetes Engine Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Google Kubernetes Engine?
    Top Answer:The product has no downtime.
    Read all 27 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Kubernetes...
    Top Answer:Pricing is always a concern. We keep running the service, and we need to pay for it. I rate the pricing a seven or eight out of ten.
    Read all 23 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Google Kubernetes Engine?
    Top Answer:The notifications are not informative. It's a little confusing at times.
    Read all 27 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    9th
    out of 26 in Container Management
    Views
    1,701
    Comparisons
    1,329
    Reviews
    24
    Average Words per Review
    472
    Rating
    8.0
    22nd
    out of 26 in Container Management
    Views
    165
    Comparisons
    136
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    GKE
    Learn More
    Google
    Weaveworks
    Overview

    Kubernetes Engine is a managed, production-ready environment for deploying containerized applications. It brings our latest innovations in developer productivity, resource efficiency, automated operations, and open source flexibility to accelerate your time to market.

    Weave Cloud is a software-as-a-service that simplifies deployment, monitoring and management for containers and microservices. It extends and complements popular orchestrators, and enables developers and DevOps to realize faster deployments, insightful monitoring, visualization and networking.

    Sample Customers
    Philips Lighting, Alpha Vertex, GroupBy, BQ
    IBM, Qordoba, Soho House
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business46%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Container Management
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Google Kubernetes Engine is ranked 9th in Container Management with 32 reviews while Weaveworks is ranked 22nd in Container Management. Google Kubernetes Engine is rated 8.0, while Weaveworks is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Google Kubernetes Engine writes "The auto-scaling feature helps during peak hours, but the support is not great". On the other hand, Google Kubernetes Engine is most compared with Linode, Kubernetes, OpenShift Container Platform, Rancher Labs and VMware Tanzu Mission Control, whereas Weaveworks is most compared with .

    See our list of best Container Management vendors.

    We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.