Google Search Appliance vs OpenText IDOL comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Google Logo
201 views|102 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
360 views|214 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Google Search Appliance and OpenText IDOL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, IBM, OpenText and others in Indexing and Search.
To learn more, read our detailed Indexing and Search Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Indexing and Search solutions are best for your needs.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:IDOL has several important visual analytics, like face recognition and object detection and recognition.
Top Answer:If I am not wrong, IDOL is working to release improvements in new capabilities in the next six months. There is room for improvement in some very important capabilities in visual analytics. They have… more »
Top Answer:IDOL is primarily used in related artificial intelligence solutions, for example in global. It is also used for insight from unstructured, rich media content. We are currently recording and getting… more »
Ranking
11th
out of 25 in Indexing and Search
Views
201
Comparisons
102
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
3rd
out of 25 in Indexing and Search
Views
360
Comparisons
214
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
420
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus IDOL, HPE Autonomy IDOL, HPE IDOL
Learn More
Overview

Google Search Appliance combines the search expertise of Google with features that meet today's business requirements all in one box. As features, it allows users to lend their expertise by adding handpicked results to search queries, ensuring that relevant results appear at the top for certain keywords, analyzes user behavior and preferences to learn from experience and deliver more relevant results over time and benefits from the technology of Google.com, which evolves continually through machine learning from billions of search queries.

The IDOL Server collects indexed data from connectors and stores it in its proprietary structure, optimized for fast processing and retrieval of data.
Sample Customers
British Airways, City of Calgary, Discovery Channel, Emerson Process Management, FINRA, GoDaddy.com, Hayneedle, Hays, Honeywell Aerospace, Honeywell Transportation, Posco, Soci_t_ G_n_rale Group
Bank Simpanan Nasional, Felco
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Government13%
Outsourcing Company11%
Manufacturing Company11%
Real Estate/Law Firm10%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise63%
Buyer's Guide
Indexing and Search
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, IBM, OpenText and others in Indexing and Search. Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Google Search Appliance is ranked 11th in Indexing and Search while OpenText IDOL is ranked 3rd in Indexing and Search with 5 reviews. Google Search Appliance is rated 8.0, while OpenText IDOL is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Google Search Appliance writes "Fast and efficient enterprise search application with query support in 40 different languages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText IDOL writes "Scales linearly and vertically; primarily used in AI". Google Search Appliance is most compared with , whereas OpenText IDOL is most compared with Elastic Search and Lucene.

See our list of best Indexing and Search vendors.

We monitor all Indexing and Search reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.