We performed a comparison between Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) and POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is ranked 24th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 9 reviews while POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring is ranked 65th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is rated 7.8, while POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) writes "Good logging and tracing but does need more profiling capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring writes "Gives us clear information on what is going wrong and where we need to focus to improve our applications, but it lacks automatic alerting". Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is most compared with AWS X-Ray, Datadog, Azure Monitor, Amazon CloudWatch and Grafana, whereas POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.