Compare GoSecure Email Security Platform vs. N-able Mail Assure
Sponsored
 | Anonymous User Information Security Analyst at a healthcare company |
Use GoSecure Email Security Platform? Share your opinion.
Use N-able Mail Assure? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Proofpoint, Fortinet and others in Email Security. Updated: April 2021.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"We were using Proofpoint and then we switched to Cisco... reportability was one of the main reasons we switched, but the biggest one was cost. If you can get an equivalent functionality for a better price it's wise to do so. That's what our primary decision came down to: We could get equivalent functionality at a lower price point."
"It is not that costly. We pay for the solution through a contractor and pay an annual fee."
"You're going to get what you pay for. If you're not willing to pay the price of Cisco, you're not going to get a product that's as good as Cisco. I don't think Cisco is overpriced, because for the last two years I've been comparing it to Microsoft and Cisco has been cheaper and given us more features."
"In my previous organization, avoiding four instances of CryptoLocker within an estimated six month period is approximately $600,000 in lost time and effort. Our five year cost was about a million dollars, and the four outages that we had equated to 65 percent of that five year cost."
"The licensing was all transferred."
"Compared to Cisco's on-prem service, the cost is the same, but you don't have to pay for the hardware and you don't have to maintain the system, as far as upgrades and hardware failures are concerned. It is cheaper to operate on their cloud service than it is to operate with their on-prem service."
"Cisco Secure Email and the support are priced well. It's not cheap, but there are other solutions that offer less and cost so much. For example, Microsoft is more expensive than Cisco."
Information Not Available
Information Not Available
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Answer: I love the Advanced Malware Protection feature. It works very well... The appliance has more security such as SDF, DKIM… more »
Top Answer: The licensing was all transferred. A fair amount of the configuration had to be done by hand. We didn't transfer the… more »
Top Answer: We have been struggling in the last month with Cisco encryption and with the S/MIME encryption. I don't know if it is an… more »
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 45% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Cisco Email Security, IronPort, Cisco Email Security, ESA, Email Security Appliances
SolarWinds MSP Mail, SolarWinds Mail Assure, SolarWinds MSP Mail Assure
Customers of all sizes face the same daunting challenge: email is simultaneously the most important business communication tool and the leading attack vector for security breaches. Cisco Email Security enables users to communicate securely and helps organizations combat Business Email Compromise (BEC), ransomware, advanced malware, phishing, spam, and data loss with a multilayered approach to security.
The GoSecure Email Security Platform provides next-generation Predelivery Protection, Postdelivery Detection and Email Incident Response. By covering all three elements, GoSecure follows the defense-in-depth approach, applies it to email security and protects your organization from the latest email threats.
N-able Mail Assure helps safeguard against spam, viruses, malware, ransomware, spear phishing, social engineering attacks, impersonation, spoofing, business email compromise, and other email-borne threats.
- Collective threat intelligence and machine learning to detect and protect against email threats in real time.
- Advanced threat protection for inbound and outbound email, with full support for SPF/DKIM/DMARC.
- Seamless integration with Microsoft 365 via an add-in for a native experience.
- 24/7 email continuity via web console to keep email always available.
- Encrypted, long-term email archiving with unlimited storage.
Learn more about Cisco Secure Email
Learn more about GoSecure Email Security Platform
Learn more about N-able Mail Assure
SUNY Old Westbury, CoxHealth, City of Fullerton, Indra
City of Mansfield Ohio, NeoNova
eNet Systems, WinAdmins, Newport Systems
Energy/Utilities Company21%
Retailer16%
Manufacturing Company11%
Financial Services Firm11%
Comms Service Provider33%
Computer Software Company21%
Financial Services Firm5%
Government4%
No Data Available
Comms Service Provider35%
Computer Software Company25%
Construction Company9%
Retailer8%
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise42%
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise40%
Large Enterprise56%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Proofpoint, Fortinet and others in Email Security. Updated: April 2021.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.
GoSecure Email Security Platform is ranked 45th in Email Security while N-able Mail Assure is ranked 23rd in Email Security. GoSecure Email Security Platform is rated 0.0, while N-able Mail Assure is rated 0.0. On the other hand, GoSecure Email Security Platform is most compared with , whereas N-able Mail Assure is most compared with Proofpoint Email Protection, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection, Fortinet FortiMail and SendGrid.
See our list of best Email Security vendors.
We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.