We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare GoSecure Email Security Platform vs. TitanHQ SpamTitan

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Proofpoint, Fortinet and others in Email Security. Updated: November 2021.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The licensing was all transferred.""Cisco Secure Email and the support are priced well. It's not cheap, but there are other solutions that offer less and cost so much. For example, Microsoft is more expensive than Cisco.""At times, we feel the pricing is a bit too high, but then, there is also room for discounts. We enjoy a lot of discounts, and that is why we are still with them. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.""You're going to get what you pay for. If you're not willing to pay the price of Cisco, you're not going to get a product that's as good as Cisco. I don't think Cisco is overpriced, because for the last two years I've been comparing it to Microsoft and Cisco has been cheaper and given us more features.""There are additional fees for adding features.""In my previous organization, avoiding four instances of CryptoLocker within an estimated six month period is approximately $600,000 in lost time and effort. Our five year cost was about a million dollars, and the four outages that we had equated to 65 percent of that five year cost.""Compared to Cisco's on-prem service, the cost is the same, but you don't have to pay for the hardware and you don't have to maintain the system, as far as upgrades and hardware failures are concerned. It is cheaper to operate on their cloud service than it is to operate with their on-prem service."

More Cisco Secure Email Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"The price of this solution is low. When you do purchase everything is included in the licensing cost.""We are on a per-user or per-mailbox monthly subscription. We are happy with the price of the solution. When comparing it to other solutions it is much cheaper."

More TitanHQ SpamTitan Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The added value of it is that every migration to a new version is initiated by the Cisco version itself, so that is a… more »
Top Answer: We have Microsoft and we have the E5 licenses, they have more EDR responses on certain emails. That's something that… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The solution is not hard to manage.
Top Answer: The price of this solution is low. When you do purchase everything is included in the licensing cost.
Top Answer: The solution is very slow, it crashes and we have difficulties getting emails. In an upcoming release, I would like to… more »
Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco Email Security, IronPort, Cisco Email Security, ESA, Email Security Appliances
Learn More
Overview

Customers of all sizes face the same daunting challenge: email is simultaneously the most important business communication tool and the leading attack vector for security breaches. Cisco Email Security enables users to communicate securely and helps organizations combat Business Email Compromise (BEC), ransomware, advanced malware, phishing, spam, and data loss with a multilayered approach to security.

The GoSecure Email Security Platform provides next-generation Predelivery Protection, Postdelivery Detection and Email Incident Response. By covering all three elements, GoSecure follows the defense-in-depth approach, applies it to email security and protects your organization from the latest email threats.

SpamTitan blocks spam, viruses, malware and other email threats by over 99.9%. We provide sophisticated email security for your business without making it complicated.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Secure Email
Learn more about GoSecure Email Security Platform
Learn more about TitanHQ SpamTitan
Sample Customers
SUNY Old Westbury, CoxHealth, City of Fullerton, Indra
City of Mansfield Ohio, NeoNova
De Montfort University, Scope Services, Park County School District, NRC, Quality Smith, Toyota, CarTrawler, Videotron
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company19%
Retailer14%
Manufacturing Company10%
Financial Services Firm10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company23%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm5%
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider23%
Computer Software Company22%
Manufacturing Company7%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business34%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise41%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise71%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Proofpoint, Fortinet and others in Email Security. Updated: November 2021.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.

GoSecure Email Security Platform is ranked 46th in Email Security while TitanHQ SpamTitan is ranked 22nd in Email Security with 2 reviews. GoSecure Email Security Platform is rated 0.0, while TitanHQ SpamTitan is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of TitanHQ SpamTitan writes "Seamless email categorization, powerful antivirus scan engines, and reliable". GoSecure Email Security Platform is most compared with Proofpoint Email Protection, whereas TitanHQ SpamTitan is most compared with Barracuda Essentials, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection, Fortinet FortiMail and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.

See our list of best Email Security vendors.

We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.