• Home
  • GOYA vs. Intel Xeon Phi

GOYA vs Intel Xeon Phi comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Intel Logo

GOYA

187 views|162 comparisons
Intel Logo

Intel Xeon Phi

687 views|433 comparisons
Ranking
10th
out of 13 in Enterprise GPU
Views
187
Comparisons
162
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
6th
out of 13 in Enterprise GPU
Views
687
Comparisons
433
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Knights Landing
Learn More
Intel
Intel
Overview

Purpose-Built for AI Inference, 15,453 images-per-second throughput on ResNet-50.

The Intel Xeon Phi processor is a bootable host processor that delivers massive parallelism and vectorization to support the most demanding high-performance computing applications. The integrated and power-efficient architecture delivers significantly more compute per unit of energy consumed versus comparable platforms to give you an improved total cost of ownership.1 The integration of memory and fabric topples the memory wall and reduces cost to help you solve your biggest challenges faster.

Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company18%
University16%
Educational Organization9%
Computer Software Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise67%

GOYA is ranked 10th in Enterprise GPU while Intel Xeon Phi is ranked 6th in Enterprise GPU. GOYA is rated 0.0, while Intel Xeon Phi is rated 0.0. On the other hand, GOYA is most compared with GAUDI and Intel Movidius Myriad X VPU, whereas Intel Xeon Phi is most compared with NVIDIA Tesla, NVIDIA TITAN V, Intel Movidius Myriad X VPU, NVIDIA DGX Systems and Radeon Instinct.

See our list of best Enterprise GPU vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise GPU reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.