GTB Technologies Inspector vs Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GTB Technologies Inspector and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"They have a fingerprint feature that is very awesome. OCR is very awesome to have too.""The main thing that I like about GTB is that it has a single agent for DLP and data classification. You can use the same agent. In terms of licensing too, it has a single license. When it comes to data classification, it supports open-source document platforms such as ChainSoft and OpenOffice.""The product has a centralized console for everything.""I am impressed with the tool's ease of deployment.""The classifications in place are very helpful in making policies for ensuring sensitive data can be contained.""The most valuable feature is we can develop what we want. If we have an old or new requirement, they are able to support us to develop it all within one month.""This solution helps classify what is confidential and what is not, allowing products to be installed at home if they do not contain confidential information."

More GTB Technologies Inspector Pros →

"I'm not an administrator of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, but an end-user, and what I like about it is that it can detect events that could cause data loss. It's a good solution.""The most values feature of this solution are the micro DLP features.""We find the initial setup to be very easy.""We use Trend Micro mainly to monitor user activities, such as tracking the websites they visit and purchase items. Additionally, we focus on identifying and addressing antivirus threats. We used to explore a feature related to proxy but decided against it as an enterprise solution wasn't readily available for us. Our primary use of Trend Micro revolves around end-user security. Integration with Active Directory has proven beneficial, allowing us to easily push updates or changes directly from the console.""The product's initial setup phase was easy.""The basic setup, like configuring servers or deploying the SaaS platform and agent implementation, is straightforward.""There are no issues with the interface.""The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."

More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Pros →

Cons
"They have a roadmap for the Linux platform and Mac as well, and in the next quarter, they might have patch management also for Windows. However, they don't have that much for Linux and Mac. So, we need those things in Linux and Mac as well.""It would be great if they have information rights management (IRM) on the same agent.""The product needs to improve its support so that users can just log in and create tickets as opposed to sending emails. Sending emails is difficult to track. It also needs to work on its analytics platform.""The solution could improve by providing additional availability requirements.""The performance could be better.""To stay competitive, they should expand to smartphones.""The solution’s performance must be improved."

More GTB Technologies Inspector Cons →

"I would like to provide improved network direction in order to regulate all of the user agents. We only use Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention to manage various threats and malicious user agents currently.""Being able to specify an agent list, or client list, to allow support from outside of the organization, would be of benefit to this solution.""The platform's support structure for government-specific domain requirements could be improved.""Having more features apart from what the product was designed for is what I'd like to see in its next release.""Within the solution, many of the functions do not perform as intended...It is not a stable solution...It is not a scalable solution.""It's hard for me to answer any questions about missing features. It's the outside companies who support us that manage this DLP solution at this moment.""Most of the functions don't work in the way that they are supposed to.""Trend Micro could be priced better, currently, it's a bit high. And there needs to be better after the sale, technical support."

More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Its price is very reasonable and competitive."
  • "They offer a lot of features in a single bundle. So, if you want to remove some features from GTB, you can remove those. You don't need to buy those, and the price will reduce accordingly. I am very happy with the pricing."
  • "When comparing GTB Technologies Inspector to other solutions you receive a good value for your money when considering all the features and benefits."
  • "The tool's pricing is affordable and based on the number of endpoints."
  • "The tool is not expensive."
  • More GTB Technologies Inspector Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The licensing and pricing of Trend Micro are comparatively low and competitive since they are offered in a bundle, especially compared to Symantec, which was has a relatively high price."
  • "It's relatively cheap so the pricing is okay."
  • "The client needs to pay for the Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention license on an annual basis."
  • "Price-wise, it is a cheap solution. I rate the solution's pricing a two on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high."
  • "Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is expensive compared to other solutions."
  • "I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."
  • "The product is worth the money you pay for it. It is not an expensive solution."
  • "It's not too expensive, especially when compared to SecureTech, and Forcepoint. It's actually cheaper. A license costs about INR 4,000 to INR 5,000, roughly $60 per license per year. In comparison, Forcepoint licenses are around $90 to $95."
  • More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product has a centralized console for everything.
    Top Answer:The solution’s performance must be improved. Endpoint OCR affects the performance of the solution. Sometimes, the users are unable to send any emails.
    Top Answer:The product has an endpoint OCR, which other DLPs don't provide.
    Top Answer:The basic setup, like configuring servers or deploying the SaaS platform and agent implementation, is straightforward.
    Top Answer:It's not too expensive, especially when compared to SecureTech, and Forcepoint. It's actually cheaper. A license costs about INR 4,000 to INR 5,000, roughly $60 per license per year. In comparison… more »
    Top Answer:Typically, DLP solutions do not cover emails without an additional component, which necessitates a dual-service proposal. Comparatively, on-premises deployments offer more features locally than online… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,324
    Comparisons
    731
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    350
    Rating
    7.5
    Views
    2,094
    Comparisons
    748
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    491
    Rating
    6.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Inspector, GTB Technologies DLP
    Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention
    Learn More
    Overview
    Inspector is Inspection Software to manage any type of inspection to aid compliance, reduce risk, eliminate paperwork, and make you audit ready. Define what you want to inspect, when, the checks to be carried out, set pass, fail criteria, define incident creation rules, workflow and resolution deadlines. Use the mobile application to perform inspections on smart phone, tablet or mobile computer. Dashboards show compliance, incident rates and resolution activity. Start a 30 day free trial today.

    Now more than ever, your data is on the move—whether it’s on a laptop, flash drive, or moving across physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures. At any point along the way, your financial data, customer information, intellectual property, or trade secrets could be lost or stolen. Securing this data is further complicated by several growing risk factors:

    Rapidly evolving compliance regulations and mandates, including GDPR
    Continued growth of workforce mobility
    Employees using their own mobile devices and consumer apps for work
    Rising frequency of advanced persistent threats (APTs) and data breach incidents

    To avoid the embarrassment, reputation damage, regulatory fines, and revenue loss, today’s enterprise must be able to identify, track, and secure all confidential data from multiple points within the organisation and in the cloud without impacting employee productivity and performance. In the past, many organisations tried traditional data loss prevention (DLP) solutions but found they were too intrusive, too complex to manage, and too costly to acquire, deploy, and maintain.

    Sample Customers
    Supya Security Software
    Excite Japan, MEDHOST, United Way of Greater Atlanta, University of Florida at Shands
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Insurance Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business71%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise20%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GTB Technologies Inspector is ranked 16th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 7 reviews while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is ranked 12th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 14 reviews. GTB Technologies Inspector is rated 8.2, while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is rated 6.2. The top reviewer of GTB Technologies Inspector writes "Good policy creation and data protection but needs better performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention writes "Good for data blocking and security, content categorization, and generating accessibility reports ". GTB Technologies Inspector is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and Digital Guardian, whereas Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention, Amazon Macie and Digital Guardian. See our GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention report.

    See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

    We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.