Compare Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection vs. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, Forter and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: December 2020.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"I don't like the length of our vendor contracts because it kills our flexibility."

More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
369
Comparisons
302
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
1,119
Comparisons
757
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
1,104
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
FraudMAPActimize, NICE Actimize, Nice Actimize Fraud and Authentication Management)
Learn
Guardian Analytics
Video Not Available
NICE
Overview

Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is the first fraud prevention solution to use behavior-based anomaly detection. To complement our expertise in behavioral analytics, we actively study fraudsters’ techniques to make sure we’re always one step ahead. We are also the only solution that automatically and immediately protects 100 percent of users and account holders against all types of threats and schemes, and dynamically adapts to new attacks and changes in legitimate user behavior. In addition to fraudulent payments, we detect account takeover, reconnaissance, and fraud set-up activity that indicate possible criminal activity in the early stages of an attack so our customers can proactively intervene before there’s any money movement. And we do it all without rules and without disrupting users’ normal activity or process.

Delivers real-time, customer-centric fraud prevention that supports a holistic, enterprise-wide fraud management program.
Offer
Learn more about Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection
Learn more about Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management
Sample Customers
Illinois Community Bank, NEFCUAssociated Banc-Corp
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm29%
Comms Service Provider25%
Computer Software Company23%
Media Company9%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Large Enterprise75%
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, Forter and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: December 2020.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is ranked 21st in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is ranked 2nd in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 8 reviews. Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is rated 0.0, while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management writes "Offers robotics, machine learning, and enables us to reduce analysts ". Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is most compared with Splunk User Behavior Analytics and IBM Trusteer, whereas Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is most compared with BAE Systems NetReveal, FICO Falcon Platform, Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub, ThreatMetrix and Pindrop Protect.

See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.