Compare Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection vs. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management
 |
Most Helpful Review | |||
Use Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection? Share your opinion. |
| ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, Forter and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: December 2020. 456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | "I don't like the length of our vendor contracts because it kills our flexibility." More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Pricing and Cost Advice » |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs. 456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 369 Comparisons 302 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 1,119 Comparisons 757 Reviews 8 Average Words per Review 1,104 Rating 8.0 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 36% of the time.  Compared 30% of the time. |  Compared 22% of the time.  Compared 22% of the time.  Compared 14% of the time.  Compared 12% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| FraudMAP | Actimize, NICE Actimize, Nice Actimize Fraud and Authentication Management) |
Learn | |
| Guardian Analytics Video Not Available | NICE |
Overview | |
Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is the first fraud prevention solution to use behavior-based anomaly detection. To complement our expertise in behavioral analytics, we actively study fraudsters’ techniques to make sure we’re always one step ahead. We are also the only solution that automatically and immediately protects 100 percent of users and account holders against all types of threats and schemes, and dynamically adapts to new attacks and changes in legitimate user behavior. In addition to fraudulent payments, we detect account takeover, reconnaissance, and fraud set-up activity that indicate possible criminal activity in the early stages of an attack so our customers can proactively intervene before there’s any money movement. And we do it all without rules and without disrupting users’ normal activity or process. | Delivers real-time, customer-centric fraud prevention that supports a holistic, enterprise-wide fraud management program. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection | Learn more about Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management |
Sample Customers | |
| Illinois Community Bank, NEFCU | Associated Banc-Corp |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Financial Services Firm29% Comms Service Provider25% Computer Software Company23% Media Company9% |
Company Size | |
No Data Available | Small Business25% Large Enterprise75% |
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, Forter and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: December 2020.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is ranked 21st in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is ranked 2nd in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 8 reviews. Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is rated 0.0, while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management writes "Offers robotics, machine learning, and enables us to reduce analysts ". Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is most compared with Splunk User Behavior Analytics and IBM Trusteer, whereas Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is most compared with BAE Systems NetReveal, FICO Falcon Platform, Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub, ThreatMetrix and Pindrop Protect.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.