Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection vs Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection and Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
503
Comparisons
377
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Fraud Detection and Prevention
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
FraudMAP
Learn More
Guardian Analytics
Video Not Available
Overview

Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is the first fraud prevention solution to use behavior-based anomaly detection. To complement our expertise in behavioral analytics, we actively study fraudsters’ techniques to make sure we’re always one step ahead. We are also the only solution that automatically and immediately protects 100 percent of users and account holders against all types of threats and schemes, and dynamically adapts to new attacks and changes in legitimate user behavior. In addition to fraudulent payments, we detect account takeover, reconnaissance, and fraud set-up activity that indicate possible criminal activity in the early stages of an attack so our customers can proactively intervene before there’s any money movement. And we do it all without rules and without disrupting users’ normal activity or process.

Oracle Adaptive Access Manager helps organizations prevent fraud and misuse by strengthening existing authentication flows, evaluating the risk of events as they happen and providing risk-based interdiction mechanisms such as multi-factor out-of-band authentication. Intuitive policy administration and standardized integrations with the Identity and Access Management Suite components makes Oracle Adaptive Access Manager uniquely flexible and effective at reducing an enterprise's security exposure. Oracle Adaptive Access Manager provides real-time and batch risk analytics to combat fraud and misuse across multiple channels of access. It automates reviews of access and transaction events to detect fraud and misuse resulting in saved time and money, a proven capabilities and quick return on investment.
Sample Customers
Illinois Community Bank, NEFCU
Department of Conservation, New Zealand, Sudhir Power Ltd., Joyo Bank Ltd., Boxfusion, Mitsubishi Corporation, Saga d.o.o. Beograd, Asia Commercial Bank, Taikang Life Insurance Co. Ltd., Yapi Kredi Bank, Overhead Door Corporation, TEAM Informatics Pty Ltd.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm45%
Computer Software Company9%
Government6%
Manufacturing Company4%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise74%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is ranked 16th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is rated 0.0, while Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is most compared with Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub, Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management, F5 Shape Security, IBM Trusteer and ThreatMetrix, whereas Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] is most compared with .

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.