• Home
  • Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication

Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection vs RSA Adaptive Authentication comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection and RSA Adaptive Authentication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection?
Andres Roldan
It stops fraud in banks and reduces their costs
We are a partner who is supporting the application for our customers. Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "You may need to opt for second best if funding is low and the number of users is huge. However, the pricing is able to be negotiated if your user figures are huge."
  • "Keep the proxy service layer on premises. That consumes SaaS security services on the back-end."
  • "Customers need to deploy the solution in a very expensive infrastructure. RSA should should think about a less expensive infrastructure for customers because the solution costs around $100,000, and the infrastructure needed to support that solution may be even more expensive than that price."
  • "The pricing is $50 per head, yearly."

    • More RSA Adaptive Authentication Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    15th
    out of 64 in Fraud Detection and Prevention
    Views
    503
    Comparisons
    376
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    25th
    out of 105 in Authentication Systems
    Views
    319
    Comparisons
    268
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    FraudMAP
    Learn More
    Guardian Analytics
    Video Not Available
    RSA
    Overview

    Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is the first fraud prevention solution to use behavior-based anomaly detection. To complement our expertise in behavioral analytics, we actively study fraudsters’ techniques to make sure we’re always one step ahead. We are also the only solution that automatically and immediately protects 100 percent of users and account holders against all types of threats and schemes, and dynamically adapts to new attacks and changes in legitimate user behavior. In addition to fraudulent payments, we detect account takeover, reconnaissance, and fraud set-up activity that indicate possible criminal activity in the early stages of an attack so our customers can proactively intervene before there’s any money movement. And we do it all without rules and without disrupting users’ normal activity or process.

    RSA Adaptive Authentication is a risk-based two-factor authentication solution providing cost-effective protection for an entire user base. Adaptive Authentication secures online portals, SSL VPNs, and web access management portals for different types of organizations in the healthcare, insurance, enterprise, government, financial services, and other industries. Based on the transparent two-factor authentication technology, Adaptive Authentication works behind the scenes to authenticate end users and transactions based on individual end user and device profiles. In addition, Adaptive Authentication uses the RSA Risk Engine to estimate the level of risk for the specific activity and uses information collected from the RSAeFraudNetwork (a cross-organization, cross-application, cross-border online fraud network) to identify fraudulent activities. The Policy Manager determines what actions must be performed, depending on the risk score and other parameters.
    Sample Customers
    Illinois Community Bank, NEFCU
    ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm46%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Retailer5%
    Government5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm47%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Retailer4%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise86%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise78%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is ranked 15th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while RSA Adaptive Authentication is ranked 25th in Authentication Systems. Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is rated 0.0, while RSA Adaptive Authentication is rated 6.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Adaptive Authentication writes "It stops fraud in banks and reduces their costs". Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is most compared with Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub, Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management, F5 Shape Security and IBM Trusteer, whereas RSA Adaptive Authentication is most compared with RSA Authentication Manager, ThreatMetrix, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and IBM Trusteer.

    We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.