Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs Trend Micro Deep Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Akamai Logo
6,464 views|3,508 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Trend Micro Logo
1,992 views|1,434 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jul 26, 2023

We compared Trend Micro Deep Security and Akamai Guardicore Segmentation based on our users' reviews in six categories. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:

  • Ease of Deployment: Trend Micro Deep Security's initial setup can be more complex and time-consuming, potentially taking four to five days for installation. In contrast, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation has a simpler setup process. 
  • Features: Trend Micro Deep Security is highly regarded for its extensive security measures and safeguarding of data centers. It also excels in virtual patching, offering stability, scalability, and a user-friendly interface. On the other hand, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation provides the advantage of flexibility in establishing network security zones, with a simple setup process. It is also praised for its scalability and seamless integration with Active Directory.
  • Room for Improvement: In terms of Trend Micro Deep Security, there are areas that could be enhanced such as complexity, design, and integration with Microsoft Defender. On the other hand, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation could benefit from better support for large organizations, an agentless option, and improved cost.
  • Pricing: Trend Micro Deep Security's setup cost is considered to be high and expensive. On the other hand, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation's pricing is not discussed. 
  • ROI: The effectiveness and benefits of Trend Micro Deep Security and Akamai Guardicore Segmentation in terms of ROI can differ depending on factors like the size of the environment and security requirements.
  • Service and Support: Trend Micro Deep Security's customer service has received varied feedback, with some users describing it as efficient and responsive, while others have had to endure long wait times. On the other hand, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation's customer service is highly regarded for its attentive and understanding approach, featuring knowledgeable representatives.

Comparison Results: Trend Micro Deep Security offers extensive security measures and safeguards for data centers and servers, including convenient virtual patching. Nevertheless, it is deemed difficult to handle and has limitations concerning integration and pricing. Conversely, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation allows for the easy establishment of network security zones and boasts robust customer support. However, it may encounter difficulties in larger organizations and lacks support for certain technologies.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Trend Micro Deep Security Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"From day one, you get threat intelligence. It will immediately block active threats, which has been useful.""The solution is very scalable, especially when connected to the cloud resources.""Initially, I liked the telemetry part. But later, we used the microsegmentation features that we were able to deploy and found that they really stood out from other vendors. It allows us to see microsegmentation as distributed services.""Its deception features are great, providing a rich telemetry of lured origins, and are a great resource for any active defense strategy.""That is primarily because I've seen increased rules. It's kind of caught us a little off guard. With GuardiCore, I have had to deal with their technical support and engineering team in Israel. They are amazing. They are very quick to adapt.""Application Ring-Fencing and Deception Server, which is basically like a honeypot, are pretty useful features.""I found the solution to be stable.""The most valuable features of the solution are the maps and ring fencing that help monitor events."

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation Pros →

"In terms of valuable features, I would say its intrusion prevention. Each and every IP connecting to the server gets scanned so we know everyone who is accessing our server and we can block whichever IP's do not belong to us at the firewall.""Aside from the basic antivirus features, there are additional features such as vulnerability protection, firewall, etc. which are helpful.""It provides a comprehensive feature set and a strong security baseline for us with integrations into other security tools.""DLP, Data Loss Prevention, and the complexity of how we manage the console and how this client, or this tool, will notify us when there is something going wrong within the server and endpoint, is good.""There are a good signature set and a high rate of detection.""We like the Smart protection and the Virtual patching.""The integration and configuration of this product in our AWS environment was good. We haven't had any problems at all.""Trend Micro Deep Security is a complete solution and all the threat management has been taken care of."

More Trend Micro Deep Security Pros →

Cons
"Customers would want to see the cost improved.""The product needs a few features like enhanced user policies and payload-level inspection to improve the offering.""Kubernetes is not installed in the way we need it.""Guardicore Centra should incorporate automation so that we don't require to write custom scripts and APIs. The tool also has limitations on rules where it allows only sixty thousand rules. Our clients have also commented that there are too many manual clicks and effort to do changes. I think that the incorporation of automation can help our clients make changes with confidence and without the possibility of human error.""In our version, when using the terminal server, we cannot exclude user tasks for each session.""Needs more customization of honeypots and a vaster catalog of systems able to be mimicked.""The long-term management of the security policies could be improved with some kind of automation platform, something like Chef or Puppet or Ansible, to help you manage the policies after day-one... to then manage the policies and changes to those policies, going forward, through some type of automation process is not turning out to be really easy.""Clients would like to see that the security policies of GuardiCore can continue to be comparable to all the major firewall players out there."

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation Cons →

"We want to see improved authentication.""Enhancements in agent performance are needed, specifically in reducing server utilization during scanning.""The support for email protection can be improved.""There should be signature-based advanced and responsive features.""The licensing structure could improve.""In the solution, servers often go offline for various reasons, requiring us to manually check the cause or issue, such as connectivity issues, and to find out why the agent went offline.""Some of the reporting and integrations could be more robust.""Trend Micro is not government certified or federal complaint. If they could become compliant/certified, this would make it easier for us to use it for our government projects."

More Trend Micro Deep Security Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "GuardiCore has made some new changes to the license now. We've seen monthly and annual licenses based on a subscription. We have a few clients that pay anywhere from $25,000 a year."
  • "Compared to the pricing we were seeing from both Illumio and Edgewise, Guardicore was very competitive."
  • "Guardicore Centra provides better value for money than NSX, was the other solution that we looked at, which was too expensive for what it does."
  • "This is not a cheap solution but you have to consider the bigger picture, which is what it is giving you."
  • "The customer would complain about the cost."
  • "The solution is reasonably priced and I would rate it a six out of ten. The tool's licensing costs are yearly."
  • "The price is the same as other products in the market. There's no price argument to choose one or the other product, it will cost the customer approximately the same."
  • "Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is expensive."
  • More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "On an AWS defined scope, it will cheaper than buying the on-premise service. We did a trial for the on-premise version, but we decided to go with the AWS version. We are downsizing our server room, and it didn't make sense to put more machines in there."
  • "Purchasing on the AWS Marketplace was easy. We decided to purchase this solution on the AWS Marketplace since we were already there."
  • "The pricing is fair."
  • "Our company chose to procure this product via AWS Marketplace due to regulatory requirements. We mostly use it in the AWS GovCloud."
  • "Purchasing on the AWS Marketplace is like shopping on Amazon Prime."
  • "We do pay-as-you-go pricing, which is good for us. We are working with Trend Micro's sales rep to see if we can have something similar for on-premise."
  • "We have saved a 50% ROI for the on-premise product. It gave us significant improvement overall in productivity, costs, and efficiency."
  • "We did not purchase it through the AWS Marketplace because we have used Trend Micro in the past."
  • More Trend Micro Deep Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud and Data Center Security solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Guardicore Centra offers the best coverage specifically in backward compatibility with legacy operating systems.
    Top Answer:The pricing is too high. Based on market standards, I'd recommend lowering the price. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten, with ten being affordable. The DQE feature increases the license cost… more »
    Top Answer:Customers would want to see the cost improved.
    Top Answer:I like that Crowdstrike allows me to easily correlate data between my firewalls. What’s most useful for my needs is the intelligence modules feature. I also find that Crowdstrike Falcon’s dashboard is… more »
    Top Answer:Trend Micro Deep Security offers a lot of features. It guarantees security for your data center, cloud, and containers - all with a unified and comprehensive SaaS solution and without compromising… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    6,464
    Comparisons
    3,508
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    442
    Rating
    7.5
    Views
    1,992
    Comparisons
    1,434
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    417
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Guardicore Centra, GuardiCore
    Deep Security
    Learn More
    Akamai
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is a software-based microsegmentation solution that provides the simplest, fastest, and most intuitive way to enforce Zero Trust principles. It enables you to prevent malicious lateral movement in your network through precise segmentation policies, visuals of activity within your IT environment, and network security alerts. Akamai Guardicore Segmentation works across your data centers, multicloud environments, and endpoints. It is faster to deploy than infrastructure segmentation approaches and provides you with unparalleled visibility and control of your network.

    Trend Micro Deep Security is a comprehensive solution for endpoint security and server protection, which prevents ransomware attacks and unauthorized access attempts. Its valuable features include tracing back attacks, antivirus protection, endpoint detection and response, firewall-based solution, threat detection, predictive machine learning and AI monitoring, VPM, virtualization, and sandboxing. 

    The solution is easy to use, scalable, stable, and reliable, with good technical support. It has helped organizations perform well against malware and vulnerabilities, provide patching from the Protection Cloud, and improve their security posture.

    Trend Micro Deep Security Features

    Trend Micro Deep Security has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Server virtualization: Trend Micro Deep Security allows you to secure your virtual environment while gaining the benefits of virtualization, such as increased efficiencies and ROI. Security that is virtualization-aware preserves productivity and allows for higher VM densities.
    • Desktop virtualization: Trend Micro Deep Security provides the best security for a wide range of virtual desktop scenarios. Its anti-malware, intrusion prevention, web application protection, firewall, and other security features are optimized for VMware VDI environments. This ensures that the virtual desktops and underlying host are not impacted by a security agent.
    • VMware NSX integration: The integration of NSX within the Trend Micro Deep Security platform improves security deployment automation while also enhancing virtual environment protection. Trend Micro Deep Security enhances the advantages of micro-segmentation by adding security policies and capabilities that follow VMs everywhere they go.
    • Virtual patching: Virtual patching solutions from Trend Micro Deep Security provide immediate security while removing the challenges of emergency patching, repeated patch cycles, and costly system downtime. Virtual patching with Trend Micro Deep Security keeps your servers and endpoints secure while lowering the risk of breach disclosure costs.
    • Cloud protection: Agentless and agent-based deployments from Trend Micro Deep Security give various cloud implementation options with cross-cloud administration. This protects your servers, applications, and data.
    • Virtualization security: Trend Micro Deep Security protects virtual desktops and servers from zero-day malware and network-based threats. This can reduce the impact of resource inefficiencies and emergency patching.
    • Cloud security: Service providers and modern data center managers can use Trend Micro Deep Security to deliver a safe multi-tenant cloud environment with security policies that can be extended to cloud workloads and managed centrally with consistent, context-aware policies.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Trend Micro Deep Security stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its robust data and loss prevention feature and its patch management, which saves users money. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

    One PeerSpot reviewer, a Senior Security Advisor at a healthcare company, writes, “DLP, Data Loss Prevention, and the complexity of how we manage the console and how this client, or this tool, will notify us when there is something going wrong within the server and endpoint, is good.”

    Nadeem S., CEO at Haniya Technologies, notes of the solution, “Patch management is most valuable. The major selling point of Deep Security is that it is based on the cloud. Deep Security is for the servers and databases of data centers, and generally, for patch management, you have to shut down the machines, and then you have to restart them. So, they need shutdown time, which is a cost.”

    Sample Customers
    Santander, Frontier Airlines, OpenLink, Intermountain Healthcare, Cellcom, BancoBASE
    Rush University Medical Center, Guess? Inc., Mazda Motor Logistics Europe, MEDHOST, KSC Commercial Internet Co., Ricoh Company Ltd., Square Enix, SoftBank Telecom, Telecom Italia, United Way of Greater Atlanta, A&W Food Services of Canada
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    University20%
    Retailer10%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Educational Organization10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Government5%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Healthcare Company16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization32%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise45%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise42%
    Large Enterprise42%
    Buyer's Guide
    Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Trend Micro Deep Security
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Trend Micro Deep Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is ranked 3rd in Cloud and Data Center Security with 17 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 6th in Cloud and Data Center Security with 80 reviews. Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is rated 8.2, while Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Akamai Guardicore Segmentation writes "Allowed us to build out a data center topology without worrying about placement of physical or virtual firewalls that can create bottlenecks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "Offers excellent endpoint protection and great stability ". Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is most compared with Illumio, VMware NSX, Cisco Secure Workload, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Darktrace, whereas Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Micro Apex One, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Endpoint Security and Bitdefender GravityZone EDR. See our Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Trend Micro Deep Security report.

    See our list of best Cloud and Data Center Security vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud and Data Center Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.