Compare Guardicore Infection Monkey vs. XM Cyber HaXM

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
536,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Application Ring-Fencing and Deception Server, which is basically like a honeypot, are pretty useful features.
Top Answer: They can maybe improve their customer service just because they are kind of a small organization, and customer service isn't as big as others such as VMware.
Top Answer: I am using it for segmentation. If someone has access to a development system, they can't take that development system and access production equipment.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
189
Comparisons
103
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
342
Rating
8.0
Views
843
Comparisons
573
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Guardicore
Video Not Available
Overview

Guardicore is a data center and cloud security company that protects your organization’s core assets using flexible, quickly deployed, and easy to understand microsegmentation controls. Our solutions provide a simpler, faster way to guarantee persistent and consistent security — for any application, in any IT environment.

Our mission goes beyond creating great technology. We continuously engage with our customers as a trusted partner, ensuring they maximize the value of their security investments beyond their original goals and expectations.

HaXM by XM Cyber is the first breach and attack simulation (BAS) platform to simulate, validate and remediate attackers’ paths to your critical assets 24×7. HaXM’s automated purple teaming aligns red and blue teams to provide the full realistic APT experience on one hand while delivering vital prioritized remediation on the other. Addressing real user behavior and exploits, the full spectrum of scenarios is aligned to your organization’s own network to expose blind spots and is executed using the most up-to-date attack techniques safely, without affecting network availability and user experience.

Offer
Learn more about Guardicore Infection Monkey
Learn more about XM Cyber HaXM
Sample Customers
Blue Bastion, Beckman Coulter
Ovum, Plymouth Rock Corporation
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider29%
Financial Services Firm6%
Media Company5%

Guardicore Infection Monkey is ranked 4th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 1 review while XM Cyber HaXM is ranked 6th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Guardicore Infection Monkey is rated 8.0, while XM Cyber HaXM is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Guardicore Infection Monkey writes "Stable with useful Application Ring-Fencing and Deception Server features". On the other hand, Guardicore Infection Monkey is most compared with AttackIQ and Cymulate, whereas XM Cyber HaXM is most compared with Cymulate, Pentera, Verodin, AttackIQ and SafeBreach.

See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.