Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs Rapid7 Metasploit comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Akamai Logo
6,464 views|3,508 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Rapid7 Logo
2,660 views|1,560 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Akamai Guardicore Segmentation and Rapid7 Metasploit based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Cisco, Akamai and others in Cloud and Data Center Security.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud and Data Center Security Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Guardicore Centra offers the best coverage specifically in backward compatibility with legacy operating systems.""The most valuable features of the solution are the maps and ring fencing that help monitor events.""I found the solution to be stable.""This tool greatly helps in understanding the footprint of the attacks.""The interface and dashboard are amazing.""The solution is very scalable, especially when connected to the cloud resources.""The tool's most valuable feature is its visibility.""The real bonus is the fact that we can secure applications, all the way down to the individual services, on each host. It's actually more granular security than we can get out of a traditional firewall."

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation Pros →

"It allows us to concentrate solely on identified vulnerabilities without the hassle of additional setup.""Rapid7 Metasploit is a useful product.""It contains almost all the available exploits and payloads.""It is scalable. It's in line with our needs.""All of the features are great.""It's not possible to do penetration testing without being very proficient in Metasploit.""The greatest advantage of Rapid7 Metasploit is that it is the only system that can directly exploit vulnerabilities on the Metasploit platform.""Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

More Rapid7 Metasploit Pros →

Cons
"They can maybe improve their customer service just because they are kind of a small organization, and customer service isn't as big as others such as VMware.""Customers would want to see the cost improved.""The dashboard needs improvement. It should be more flexible so that I can easily see what I want or need to see.""Kubernetes is not installed in the way we need it.""It doesn't support a PAAC solution (Platforma as a service) in the cloud.""The long-term management of the security policies could be improved with some kind of automation platform, something like Chef or Puppet or Ansible, to help you manage the policies after day-one... to then manage the policies and changes to those policies, going forward, through some type of automation process is not turning out to be really easy.""Incident tagging could be improved. Other vendors offer semi-automatic tagging, which Guardicore doesn't yet have.""Supports become difficult when it's for a big organization. For a small organization, medium organization, it still makes sense, however, for a big organization, it makes life difficult."

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation Cons →

"I would like to see more capabilities, more functions, and more features. More types of attack vectors.""If your company's patch is not up to date, but you have other detection or defense solutions such as endpoint detection and response and antivirus software, the product exploit may not work effectively. This is because its exploit database update process is slow and not real-time. For zero-day vulnerabilities or new security threats, relying on Rapid7 Metasploit alone may not be effective.""Rapid7 Metasploit can add a GUI feature because it is only available online.""Rapid7 Metasploit could be made easier for new users to learn.""There are numerous outdated exploits in their database that should be updated.""The solution should improve the responsiveness of its live technical support.""I think areas with shortcomings that need improvement are more integration and automation.""At the time I was using it, the graphical user interface needed some improvements."

More Rapid7 Metasploit Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "GuardiCore has made some new changes to the license now. We've seen monthly and annual licenses based on a subscription. We have a few clients that pay anywhere from $25,000 a year."
  • "Compared to the pricing we were seeing from both Illumio and Edgewise, Guardicore was very competitive."
  • "Guardicore Centra provides better value for money than NSX, was the other solution that we looked at, which was too expensive for what it does."
  • "This is not a cheap solution but you have to consider the bigger picture, which is what it is giving you."
  • "The customer would complain about the cost."
  • "The solution is reasonably priced and I would rate it a six out of ten. The tool's licensing costs are yearly."
  • "The price is the same as other products in the market. There's no price argument to choose one or the other product, it will cost the customer approximately the same."
  • "Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is expensive."
  • More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I use the open-source version of this product. Pricing is not relevant."
  • "It is expensive. Our license expired, and our company is not thinking to renew because of our budget."
  • "The great advantage with Rapid7 Metasploit, of course, is that it's free."
  • "There are two versions available, one of which is the Pro version, and the other is the free version."
  • "Rapid7 Metasploit is cheaper than Tenable.io Vulnerability Management."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product's pricing a six. So it's fairly priced."
  • "The pricing structure involves a one-time purchase cost of approximately twenty thousand dollars or euros for all customers."
  • "We pay monthly. The pricing is reasonable."
  • More Rapid7 Metasploit Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud and Data Center Security solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Guardicore Centra offers the best coverage specifically in backward compatibility with legacy operating systems.
    Top Answer:The pricing is too high. Based on market standards, I'd recommend lowering the price. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten, with ten being affordable. The DQE feature increases the license cost… more »
    Top Answer:Customers would want to see the cost improved.
    Top Answer:I use Rapid7 Metasploit for payload generation and Post-Exploitation.
    Top Answer:Rapid7 Metasploit could be made easier for new users to learn.
    Ranking
    Views
    6,464
    Comparisons
    3,508
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    442
    Rating
    7.5
    11th
    Views
    2,660
    Comparisons
    1,560
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    402
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Guardicore Centra, GuardiCore
    Metasploit
    Learn More
    Akamai
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is a software-based microsegmentation solution that provides the simplest, fastest, and most intuitive way to enforce Zero Trust principles. It enables you to prevent malicious lateral movement in your network through precise segmentation policies, visuals of activity within your IT environment, and network security alerts. Akamai Guardicore Segmentation works across your data centers, multicloud environments, and endpoints. It is faster to deploy than infrastructure segmentation approaches and provides you with unparalleled visibility and control of your network.

    Attackers are always developing new exploits and attack methods—Metasploit penetration testing software helps you use their own weapons against them. Utilizing an ever-growing database of exploits, you can safely simulate real-world attacks on your network to train your security team to spot and stop the real thing.

    Sample Customers
    Santander, Frontier Airlines, OpenLink, Intermountain Healthcare, Cellcom, BancoBASE
    City of Corpus Christi, Diebold, Lumenate, Nebraska Public Power District, Prairie North Regional Health, Apptio, Automation Direct, Bob's Stores, Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions, Carnegie Mellon University
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    University20%
    Retailer10%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Educational Organization10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Government5%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider36%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Integrator9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud and Data Center Security
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Cisco, Akamai and others in Cloud and Data Center Security. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is ranked 3rd in Cloud and Data Center Security with 17 reviews while Rapid7 Metasploit is ranked 11th in Vulnerability Management with 18 reviews. Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is rated 8.2, while Rapid7 Metasploit is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Akamai Guardicore Segmentation writes "Allowed us to build out a data center topology without worrying about placement of physical or virtual firewalls that can create bottlenecks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 Metasploit writes "Helps find vulnerabilities in a system to determine whether the system needs to be upgraded". Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is most compared with Illumio, VMware NSX, Cisco Secure Workload, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, whereas Rapid7 Metasploit is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Pentera, Rapid7 InsightVM, Acunetix and Nucleus.

    We monitor all Cloud and Data Center Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.