OpenText EnCase eDiscovery vs Smarsh eDiscovery comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
549 views|431 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Smarsh Logo
172 views|120 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText EnCase eDiscovery and Smarsh eDiscovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Alejandro Stromer
Use Smarsh eDiscovery?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "​The product is affordable and user-friendly.​"
  • "EnCase is an affordable solution."
  • "We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."
  • "We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."
  • More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
    Top Answer:We have experience in engineering and capital projects. It is an add-on to extend project and asset management documentation.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    6th
    out of 40 in eDiscovery
    Views
    549
    Comparisons
    431
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    343
    Rating
    9.0
    19th
    out of 40 in eDiscovery
    Views
    172
    Comparisons
    120
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    EnCase eDiscovery
    Micro Focus eDiscovery, Autonomy eDiscovery, HPE Autonomy eDiscovery, HPE eDiscovery
    Learn More
    Overview

    eDiscovery collection tools address the rise in dispersed and remote workforces, the proliferation of mobile devices and new sources of data. Comprehensively collecting data across all data sources, including endpoints, such as desktops and laptops, is critical to defensibility. Collection analytics and culling is key to efficient digital investigations, narrowing the document collection to drive down the cost of legal review.

    With OpenText™ EnCase™ eDiscovery, organizations can streamline the collection, culling and preservation of data across diverse sources in a single efficient process.

    eDiscovery is a comprehensive, end-to-end eDiscovery platform that Operates. It Combines powerful analytical tools with core strengths in understanding human information, it presents a choice of document review options to match the right workflow to each unique matter and can be combined with other offerings. Discovery delivers broad coverage across data repositories and myriad data types, and is language independent to give you the fastest, most-complete solution on the market. eDiscovery helps corporations, law firms, and government entities prepare for, and react to, legal matters involving large amounts of data - without bias to repository or location. A pioneer in legal holds, early case assessment, and Technology-Assisted Review, eDiscovery helps you solve the full breadth of discovery and investigations challenges, from data collection through production. It covers the full spectrum of requirements, including Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), information management, preservation, processing, early case assessment (ECA), review and analysis, and production, allowing you to avoid the risk and cost of switching tools or vendors at different stages of discovery. eDiscovery is underpinned by our IDOL technology, which provides access to hundreds of data types and reaches across myriad data silos throughout the enterprise, this patented software also helps you understand human-generated (unstructured) information and administer data in place.

    Sample Customers
    Ontario Ministry of Government, Aerospace Company, Chesterfield Police Department
    Bank AlJazira, MTS India, Vodafone Ireland
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Legal Firm7%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise75%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    eDiscovery
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is ranked 6th in eDiscovery with 8 reviews while Smarsh eDiscovery is ranked 19th in eDiscovery. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is rated 7.8, while Smarsh eDiscovery is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText EnCase eDiscovery writes "A stable and scalable hybrid solution with easy setup". On the other hand, OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is most compared with Nuix eDiscovery, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and kCura Relativity, whereas Smarsh eDiscovery is most compared with Microsoft Purview eDiscovery.

    See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

    We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.