We performed a comparison between OpenText EnCase eDiscovery and Sophos EPP Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two eDiscovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The technical support is excellent."
"I like the processing feature on the product because it does everything at once, i.e, indexing, recovery, keyword searches, etc."
"It speeds up the process, so I can meet my deadlines."
"It indexes much faster, and is more reflexive because of the Enscripts."
"The solution is very stable."
"The most important feature we've found is the Enscripts. That is one powerful feature that I, personally, love to use."
"Data Recovery: Its ability to repair damaged partitions and uncover hidden partitions from within the tool, and allow further analysis."
"The most valuable feature is endpoint detection and response."
"The product is stable."
"With Sophos, the scanning of viruses and scanning of the disk is done silently in the background."
"The most valuable features of Sophos EPP Suite are the synchronized threat and ransomware protection."
"It's easy to deploy."
"So easy to deploy and use that you really don't even need their technical support."
"The solution is useful for security purposes."
"It is a stable solution. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"The reporting is a bit unreliable. It needs to be better."
"In the past, incident response time for tech support was slow."
"Ease of use and learning curve need improvement."
"I would like to see a capability to ingest and absorb more data. That would be really good. It currently is lacking this function."
"We have come across problems with the end-case. We could not find an email discovery type of module and there was not flexibility with the email."
"Sometimes the application can take more time to complete the image processing or fail at the end of the process."
"There were minor UI bugs."
"Sophos EPP Suite could improve the way it can be installed. They used to have one installer and now they have two, one for the server and one for the client. I don't know the difference, it brings confusion."
"Lacks delegated administration privileges for large organizations, and differential permissions for admins."
"The user interface is not responsive."
"In the future, I would like to see better third-party integration so that it can work in conjunction with our ticket system."
"The solution is not easy to use in comparison to other endpoint security solutions."
"The solution needs to perform better or update its anti-ransomware and anti-malware engines to keep up with the latest hacking techniques."
"In my country, having an on-premises deployment model is preferred. In this part of the world, on-premises is still the way many companies want to go. Therefore, they should supply some sort of option that allows for that reality."
"The solution could be more stable."
OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is ranked 6th in eDiscovery with 8 reviews while Sophos EPP Suite is ranked 26th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 52 reviews. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is rated 7.8, while Sophos EPP Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OpenText EnCase eDiscovery writes "A stable and scalable hybrid solution with easy setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos EPP Suite writes "The solution provides endpoint detection and response with a nice-looking dashboard". OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is most compared with Nuix eDiscovery, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and Microsoft Purview eDiscovery, whereas Sophos EPP Suite is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security, Seqrite Endpoint Security, Trellix Endpoint Security, Coro and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. See our OpenText EnCase eDiscovery vs. Sophos EPP Suite report.
We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
