We performed a comparison between Gurucul UEBA and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The reporting feature was the key differentiator. I also liked the ability to create dynamic rules in the environment."
"The most valuable feature of Gurucul is the ability to customize and it is on the Hadoop platform that has a lot of flexibility."
"I appreciate the comprehensive categorization of devices based on their intended use, such as those for DNS."
"QRadar UBA's most valuable feature is the risk rating of users depending on their behavior."
"It's built around Red Hat Linux, which is highly robust."
"Provided that the report is prebuilt and I can find what I am looking for, the reporting is the most valuable feature in this solution."
"This console gives you the entire view, which makes life easier and allows you to take precautionary measures."
"The most valuable features of IBM Security QRadar are flexibility, IBM support, and scalability."
"We have worked with other solutions, such as LogRhythm and Splunk. Compared to others, IBM QRadar has the best price-performance ratio so that you are able to reserve minimum costs. It starts settling in fast and gets the first results very quickly. It is also very scalable."
"IBM QRadar has improved my organization by introducing many functions. It collects logs from all of our systems in the organization and has functioned very well. It alerts and correlates the aggregate events or offenses we receive through all the applications we use."
"We've found the technical support to be very good."
"Regarding the prioritization of threats, Gurucul UEBA needs to enhance its alert severity assignment process within the system."
"It could be more stable."
"Gurucul can improve on the online documentation. They should educate the end users more to allow them to do everything themselves."
"Dashboards and reports could provide better visualization of SIEM activity."
"The initial setup requires that you have somebody with the proper skill set, and it would help if the configuration were easier."
"While the interface is easy to use, it could be a little more responsive."
"I think that the search speed of this solution could be improved."
"Technical support is good, but not great."
"There could be better integration with the solution."
"Needs better visualization options beyond the time series charts and a few other options that they have."
"The user interface and configurability of IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics can be improved. It has a lot of pre-configured settings and not many things can be changed. It also needs more integrations. Currently, User Behavior Analytics is integrated only with IBM QRadar. It could have deeper integrations. It can also have more complicated scoring models. Currently, it has a very simple linear scoring model for users."
Gurucul UEBA is ranked 11th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 3 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 1st in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 198 reviews. Gurucul UEBA is rated 6.6, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Gurucul UEBA writes "Helped reduce our operational costs and increase our efficiency, but it can be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". Gurucul UEBA is most compared with Exabeam Fusion SIEM, Securonix Next-Gen SIEM, Splunk User Behavior Analytics and Wazuh, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security. See our Gurucul UEBA vs. IBM Security QRadar report.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.