• Home
  • Gusto vs. Zuman

Gusto vs Zuman comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Gusto Logo

Gusto

Read 3 Gusto reviews
316 views|221 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Zuman Logo

Zuman

49 views|32 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Benefits Administration
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Gusto and Zuman based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Workday, Oracle, SAP and others in Benefits Administration.
To learn more, read our detailed Benefits Administration Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Mimi Evans
Simple to use solution that offers a lot; gives employees the option to get cash advances
The way this product has helped improve our organization is by being user-friendly. I did not need anyone to teach me how to use it: it is very... Read more →
Use Zuman?
report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Benefits Administration solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
What do you like most about Gusto?
Top Answer:I appreciated the templates that they offered for new hires and onboarding.
Read all 2 answers   →
What needs improvement with Gusto?
Top Answer:I think it's great that it syncs with QuickBooks Online and any payroll software that syncs with QuickBooks Online is great. My issue with their syncing was that every single account for a deduction… more »
Read all 2 answers   →
What advice do you have for others considering Gusto?
Top Answer:Overall, I would rate this solution an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.
Read all 2 answers   →
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
14th
out of 65 in Benefits Administration
Views
316
Comparisons
221
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
419
Rating
8.0
43rd
out of 65 in Benefits Administration
Views
49
Comparisons
32
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
ZenPayroll
Learn More
Gusto
Zuman
Overview

Gusto provides payroll, benefits and HR to modern companies, by handling payments to employees and contractors and also electronically handling the paperwork necessary to help companies comply with tax, labor, and immigration laws.

Zuman is a single-source solution for the HR and finance organization, effectively allowing you to manage human resources, payroll, and benefits administration with just one partner. Zuman delivers control and efficiency to support your employees, contain costs, and ensure compliance.

Sample Customers
Farmgirl Flowers, Bevel, Pooch Pals, ALL MAVEN
Bitpay
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Comms Service Provider9%
Government9%
Educational Organization9%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business39%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise50%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Benefits Administration
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Workday, Oracle, SAP and others in Benefits Administration. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Gusto is ranked 14th in Benefits Administration with 3 reviews while Zuman is ranked 43rd in Benefits Administration. Gusto is rated 7.0, while Zuman is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Gusto writes "Simple to use solution that offers a lot; gives employees the option to get cash advances". On the other hand, Gusto is most compared with Sequoia People Platform and Namely, whereas Zuman is most compared with .

See our list of best Benefits Administration vendors.

We monitor all Benefits Administration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.