GWAVA [EOL] vs Mimecast Mailbox Continuity comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GWAVA [EOL] and Mimecast Mailbox Continuity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Veritas, Barracuda Networks and others in Email Archiving.
To learn more, read our detailed Email Archiving Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's a perfect business pump filter. We have much less false positives, and also less spam than other organizations."

More GWAVA [EOL] Pros →

"Mimecast has some good support services in place.""It has all the features required for distribution, such as the ability to mail.""The most valuable feature of Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is real-time alerts.""The security is pretty good, and that's why we're going to upgrade to an even more advanced package. We used it when we had a power issue, and it works. It has been pretty reliable, and the support has been quite good.""The Large File Send feature comes in handy when you have to send fairly large attachments.""We're now certain business-critical mail is perfectly protected in multiple ways."

More Mimecast Mailbox Continuity Pros →

Cons
"The solution needs to be more user-friendly. I don't want to have to go to my IT guy and have him explain aspects of the solution to me. There should be a way for them to be able to translate aspects of the product to a typical user in a clear concise way."

More GWAVA [EOL] Cons →

"The solution is expensive in comparison to similar solutions.""The interface isn't the best. How everything works on the back end is confusing.""Technical support has been slower than it was in the past, likely due to the pandemic.""The interface and the documentation could be improved. They can also include some more training resources and content like video. While setting things up, I had to search for the information quite a bit. It took me time to find the correct way to do something. The information is there, but it is sort of all over the place. They can create a better help knowledge base or help portal. It retains your email for 45 days. They can maybe increase this duration.""The price of the solution is expensive. It can improve by reducing the price."

More Mimecast Mailbox Continuity Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Its price is in the middle range. It is a structured licensing model where there are various components that you can add or choose to add or not."
  • "The price of Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is expensive."
  • More Mimecast Mailbox Continuity Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Archiving solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:We're now certain business-critical mail is perfectly protected in multiple ways.
    Top Answer:I don't deal with the pricing or licensing aspects of the product I can't speak to how much it costs.
    Top Answer:Overall, just across all the Mimecast pieces that we use, it's somewhat of a mess when you want to figure out where you need to go to make a change. The interface isn't the best. How everything works… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Email Archiving
    4th
    out of 21 in Email Archiving
    Views
    269
    Comparisons
    182
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    470
    Rating
    7.3
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    GWAVA provides solutions that meet and exceed the archiving, compliance, and security demands for highly-regulated organizations such as Government, Education, Healthcare and Financial Services. Retain Unified Archiving meets their needs as a value added archiving solution which enables these highly regulated industries to meet complex archiving compliance standards. This is critical, as many compliance standards and regulations cannot be met with the built in archiving solutions offered by Office 365, Exchange Online, and Gmail.

    Mimecast Mailbox Continuity provides uninterrupted access to live and archive email using Outlook for Windows, the web and mobile applications.

    Sample Customers
    SVG Strassenverkehrs-Genossenschaft Wªrttemberg eG, ELO Digital Office GmbH, Grafisch Lyceum Utrecht, Deutscher Steuerberaterverband (DStV), Investment Savings Bank of Pennsylvania, Gwinnett Health System, Long Island Rail Road, Wisconsin Historical Society, South Texas Nuclear Facility, Northwestern Michigan College, Carilion Health System, North Memorial Medical Center
    DAC Beachcroft, OceanFirst, Currie & Brown, Alexander Forbes, Lagan Group, Lals Group, Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service, Wedlake Bell, Macmillan Cancer Support, Bech-Bruun
    Buyer's Guide
    Email Archiving
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Veritas, Barracuda Networks and others in Email Archiving. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GWAVA [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Email Archiving while Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is ranked 4th in Email Archiving with 6 reviews. GWAVA [EOL] is rated 9.0, while Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of GWAVA [EOL] writes "An excellent anti-spam solution for mail systems". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mimecast Mailbox Continuity writes "Provides peace of mind and expands well but needs a better interface". GWAVA [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is most compared with Barracuda Message Archiver.

    See our list of best Email Archiving vendors.

    We monitor all Email Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.