We performed a comparison between HAProxy and Radware LinkProof based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We use it as a load balancer for our application servers."
"HAProxy potentially has a good return on investment"
"We don't have a problem with the user interface. it's good."
"Tech support is super-quick to respond, and always on target with answers specific to the current issue."
"Stability is number one."
"HAProxy Enterprise Edition has been rock solid. We have essentially had no downtime caused by our load balancers in the last 10 months, because they’ve worked so well. Previously, our load balancers caused us multiple hours per year in downtime."
"The most valuable feature of HAProxy is that its open source."
"Performance configuration options with threads, processes, and core stickiness are very valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Radware LinkProof is that it supports link load balance."
"Provides good performance and scalability."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The performance and stability are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature of Radware LinkProof for traffic distribution is its DNS management capability."
"While troubleshooting, we are having some difficulties. There are no issues when it is running; it is stable and very good; however, if there is a troubleshooting issue or an incident occurs, we will have issues because this is open-source."
"We would like to see dynamic ACL and port update support. Our infrastructure relies on randomly allocated ports and this feature would allow us to update without restarting the process."
"We've changed solutions as it doesn't fit with our current needs."
"The logging functionality could use improvement, as it is a little cryptic."
"The product does not have any new technologies."
"There is room for improvement in HAProxy's dynamic configuration."
"We need to handle new connections by dropping, or queuing them while the HAProxy restarts, and because HAProxy does not handle split config files."
"The reconfigurability in terms of the tooling could be improved and maybe an editor plugin can be added."
"Radware LinkProof's marketing efforts need improvement to raise awareness about its capabilities and compete effectively in the market."
"Radware LinkProof’s customer support could be improved."
"There are certain features I would like to see in the next release."
"Could have more customizations on the dashboard."
"The solution lacks HA configuration."
HAProxy is ranked 3rd in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 41 reviews while Radware LinkProof is ranked 13th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 5 reviews. HAProxy is rated 8.2, while Radware LinkProof is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of HAProxy writes "Offers good integration capabilities but needs to improve the monitoring part". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware LinkProof writes "Supports link load balance and has good stability". HAProxy is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, NGINX Plus, Kemp LoadMaster, Citrix NetScaler and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), whereas Radware LinkProof is most compared with Radware Alteon, A10 Networks Thunder ADC and Fortinet FortiADC. See our HAProxy vs. Radware LinkProof report.
See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.