We performed a comparison between Harbor and IBM Cloud Container Registry based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), GoHarbor, Microsoft and others in Container Registry."Right now this is the leading product in this category."
"The product is efficient and can be used for multiple environments."
"The product should integrate better with other storage options."
"The GUI needs to improve."
"IBM Cloud Container Registry should improve its API management. One improvement factor could be enhancing the integration capabilities of container registries like Harbor with hyperscaler platforms. While some container registries, like Azure Container Registry and IBM Cloud Container Registry, are tightly integrated with their respective hyperscaler environments, others may lack integration options."
Earn 20 points
Harbor is ranked 2nd in Container Registry while IBM Cloud Container Registry is ranked 7th in Container Registry with 1 review. Harbor is rated 7.0, while IBM Cloud Container Registry is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Harbor writes "Check document vulnerabilities with this cloud-native product that needs to improve in ease-of-use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Cloud Container Registry writes "A free solution that is beneficial for customers who cannot afford to create new containers on-premises". Harbor is most compared with JFrog Container Registry, Red Hat Quay, Azure Container Registry, Amazon ECR and VMware Harbor Registry, whereas IBM Cloud Container Registry is most compared with Amazon ECR.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
