We performed a comparison between Harness and IBM Rational Build Forge based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation."It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."
"All features are useful. Our customer doesn't have any complaints about the tool. It works pretty well for what they want and what they need to do."
"Very good reporting features."
"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."
"Not user friendly for the layman."
"Its logging can be improved. When something goes wrong, it is not always very easy to find the problem. It is hard to identify whether the problem is because of low memory in the server or some configuration in Rational Build Forge. The error logs are not very detailed, and they should provide more information. It should also have more integration with third-party tools. It would be great to have more integration with third-party tools."
Harness is ranked 12th in Build Automation with 1 review while IBM Rational Build Forge is ranked 19th in Build Automation. Harness is rated 7.0, while IBM Rational Build Forge is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Harness writes "Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational Build Forge writes "Great reporting features and very functional". Harness is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, Bamboo, TeamCity and GitHub Actions, whereas IBM Rational Build Forge is most compared with Jenkins, Bamboo and Digital.ai Release .
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
