Harness vs Oracle Hudson CI comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Harness Logo
2,322 views|1,872 comparisons
Oracle Logo
102 views|83 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Harness and Oracle Hudson CI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
11th
out of 41 in Build Automation
Views
2,322
Comparisons
1,872
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
32nd
out of 41 in Build Automation
Views
102
Comparisons
83
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Build Automation
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Tekton logo
Compared 23% of the time.
Jenkins logo
Compared 20% of the time.
Bamboo logo
Compared 14% of the time.
TeamCity logo
Compared 10% of the time.
GitHub Actions logo
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
Hudson CI
Learn More
Harness
Video Not Available
Overview

Harness is the first Continuous Delivery-as-a-Service platform that uses Machine Learning to simplify the entire process of delivering code from artifact into production – quickly, safely, securely, and repeatably.

Hudson monitors the execution of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron. Among those things, currently Hudson focuses on the following two jobs:

  • Building/testing software projects continuously, just like CruiseControl or DamageControl. In a nutshell, Hudson provides an easy-to-use so-called continuous integration system, making it easier for developers to integrate changes to the project, and making it easier for users to obtain a fresh build. The automated, continuous build increases productivity.
  • Monitoring executions of externally-run jobs, such as cron jobs and procmail jobs, even those that are run on a remote machine. For example, with cron, all you receive is regular e-mails that capture the output, and it is up to you to look at them diligently and notice when it broke. Hudson keeps those outputs and makes it easy for you to notice when something is wrong.
Sample Customers
Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced
Virgin Media
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm37%
Computer Software Company13%
Manufacturing Company7%
Healthcare Company4%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise78%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Build Automation
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Harness is ranked 11th in Build Automation while Oracle Hudson CI is ranked 32nd in Build Automation. Harness is rated 0.0, while Oracle Hudson CI is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Harness is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, Bamboo, TeamCity and GitHub Actions, whereas Oracle Hudson CI is most compared with Jenkins.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.