We performed a comparison between Harness and JFrog Pipeline based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation."It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."
"Testing against multiple run times, versions, and environments is a plus point with the additional pipelines making it more interesting to see what is happening across your development process in a single pane of glass."
"The platform has some amazing features and the integration option makes it very simple to plug with any of our favorite tools."
"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."
"They could work on reducing the number of permissions required while using Bitbucket."
Harness is ranked 12th in Build Automation with 1 review while JFrog Pipeline is ranked 22nd in Build Automation. Harness is rated 7.0, while JFrog Pipeline is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Harness writes "Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JFrog Pipeline writes "Testing against multiple run times, versions, and environments is a plus point". Harness is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, Bamboo, TeamCity and CircleCI, whereas JFrog Pipeline is most compared with Jenkins, Bamboo, TeamCity and GitHub Actions.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
