• Home
  • Harness vs. Wercker

Harness vs Wercker comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Harness Logo

Harness

Read 1 Harness review
2,365 views|1,885 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo

Wercker

92 views|46 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Build Automation
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Harness and Wercker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Misbah Mohammed Kollathodi
Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement
Use Wercker?
report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
12th
out of 41 in Build Automation
Views
2,365
Comparisons
1,885
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
33rd
out of 41 in Build Automation
Views
92
Comparisons
46
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Tekton logo
Tekton vs. Harness
Compared 23% of the time.
Jenkins logo
Jenkins vs. Harness
Compared 21% of the time.
Bamboo logo
Bamboo vs. Harness
Compared 15% of the time.
TeamCity logo
TeamCity vs. Harness
Compared 10% of the time.
GitHub Actions logo
GitHub Actions vs. Harness
Compared 9% of the time.
More Harness Competitors   →
More Wercker Competitors   →
Learn More
Harness
Video Not Available
Oracle
Overview

Harness is the first Continuous Delivery-as-a-Service platform that uses Machine Learning to simplify the entire process of delivering code from artifact into production – quickly, safely, securely, and repeatably.

Wercker enables organisations and their development teams to achieve their CI/CD goals with microservices and Docker. This is brought to life through our container-centric and cloud native automation platform comprising of our local CLI, online SaaS solution and API.

Sample Customers
Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced
Pivotal, Open Listings, Framer, Tablelist
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm38%
Computer Software Company12%
Manufacturing Company7%
Healthcare Company4%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise78%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Build Automation
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Harness is ranked 12th in Build Automation with 1 review while Wercker is ranked 33rd in Build Automation. Harness is rated 7.0, while Wercker is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Harness writes "Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement ". On the other hand, Harness is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, Bamboo, TeamCity and GitHub Actions, whereas Wercker is most compared with .

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.